[-] Thorosofbeer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You should check out the song "Patches" If that's what you're interested in.

[-] Thorosofbeer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The original commenters point was to use this as an example for why Universal Basic Income is a good idea and my point is that without capitalism this doesn't work. You couldn't reproduce this to cover the cost of UBI for everyone. It only works because it lives off of a very profitable industry and services a small group of people.

[-] Thorosofbeer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Bitcoin dropped in value, but is still very high and actively traded. It's hardly in the dust bin.

[-] Thorosofbeer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

A Baker should be able to refuse to bake a cake he doesn't want to make. He shouldn't even have to give a reason. Anything less than that is by definition forced labor.

[-] Thorosofbeer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think it's a smart decision. I think discriminating for any reason makes business sense nor will it win you any allies, but it should be legal. Anything less than that is the government forcing you to work.

[-] Thorosofbeer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Teams would be very offended if it could afford the spare CPU cycles to read your post.

[-] Thorosofbeer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The only real reason for every car on the road not to go hybrid is cost and cost isn't a factor for Lamborghini. Hybrid drivetrains are the perfect answer to the Ice's gross inefficiencies when at idle or lower speeds.

[-] Thorosofbeer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Liftoff is going well enough for me as well. Still miss RiF.

[-] Thorosofbeer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

"This is why people on the left are so exasperated with centrists"

Are you suggesting that Macron is a centrist? Because I don't follow.

[-] Thorosofbeer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I believe this is probably what will happen if this ever becomes a big issue. GDPR was never intended to be navigable for anything except giant proprietary blob tech companies.

[-] Thorosofbeer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I believe this is probably what will happen if this ever becomes a big issue. GDPR was never intended to be navigable for anything except giant proprietary blob tech companies.

[-] Thorosofbeer@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

This isn't really malicious compliance. This is the very foundation of the point made by the Supreme Court. You should be able to refuse service to anyone for any reason. Anything less than that is the government engaging in violence to force you to work.

view more: next ›

Thorosofbeer

joined 1 year ago