I can't believe I'm playing defense for MTG but, voting for the bill in the House was a low risk action because there was absolute certainty that there would have to be back and forth with the Senate. The vote in the house was basically a vote to get the process started in the Senate.

The bill as a whole though is still absolute shit stuffed with one horror after another. I do hold everyone who voted for it responsible for that. I just don't think it's a big deal that she voted for some specific aspects that she later opposed. That's just how the process of Omnibus bills works.

There is no indication that Trump thought he could "wipe the floor" with Bernie. In fact, it was likely the opposite. The polling certainly didn't agree, for whatever that's worth. Even if he did think that, there is no indication that he would have been right. It's funny how Trump is an evil genius when the Democrats want him to be that, and a raging moron when they want that.

Once Bernie was put up against Trump rhetorically, Bernie's lead would have grown substantially. Bernie talks to a huge segment of America that most Democrats talk past. Most Democrats don't even get heard because they have nothing worthwhile to say.

I'm responding to the entire comment. The fact that you felt his minor pushback on the dozens of non-stop whoppers Trump told is relevant to anything is astounding.

Unfortunately the Democrats need slightly more than a bare majority because some Democrats might as well be Republicans.

Kamala has also stated her support for exempting this legislation from the filibuster, something Biden didn't do. She wouldn't technically have the power herself, but might get Senate Democrats on board.

Voters rejected Kamala pretty hard in the 2020 primary. I'm pleased with the current momentum and thrilled with her VP pick, but associating Kamala's run with respect for voter's wishes is a bit of a stretch. It was the Democratic establishment that positioned her to be the candidate, not voters.

Which part is the disinformation? I think "genocide Joe" is a bit over the top, but Biden has clearly not pushed back on the Palestinian genocide as hard as the left (reasonably) wants. As for Biden's age, I think that's been pretty well vindicated now.

I don't dispute that the right disingenuously jumps on leftist issues, but I also think we need to grapple with the fact that the Democratic establishment has continuously chosen to make the party vulnerable to such attacks. Democrats should suck less than they do, not just less than Republicans.

Kamala is the backup the party leadership chose.

The DNC gets to pick any replacement. To them, that's far better than rolling the dice on a progressive winning a primary.

It has to do with the traditional rules of how the Senate operates. Senators only get so much time to both ask and receive answers to questions. It's just too easy for a witness to burn up that time with long winded non-answers. That's why Senators are quick to grab control back.

Biden isn't pro genocide, at least there is no evidence to say that. The Biden administration has been against the ground invasion from the start.

Biden has made some missteps in my opinion, but America pulling support for Israel was never a real option. Israel does require aid, but Netanyaho doesn't care if that aid comes from the US, or from his buddy Putin. Israel realigning with Russia would put Palestine in an even worse position because it would threaten their support from Iran.

Then, of course, there is the risk of a regional war breaking out of Iran takes the strained relationship between the US and Israel as an opportunity. That could easily pull other countries in and become WW3.

Foreign policy is about more than just virtue signaling. It's outcomes that matter, and what a lot of people are calling for will not get them the outcomes they are looking for.

Not that I'm shaming anyone for pressuring Biden. The positive movement on aid shipments was very likely helped along by the protest votes in Michigan.

If ever criticism is met with "But Trump...", then you are making their opinion irrelevant. There will always be a worse Republican.

List them all then. It won't matter. The plural of anecdote isn't data. The one example you gave is clearly the exception that proves the rule, otherwise you wouldn't have to go back 80 years to when pretty much every public institution mistreated and disrespected women.

You are not an honest actor, and I'm not telling you anything you don't already know. It sucks that assholes seem to worm their way into every corner of the Internet.