Scroll back up and check out the headline of the thread you're posting in...
I got just inside Act 3 before I put the game on hold to wait for patches and things like that to come out...almost ready to jump back into it. I have been romancing Shadowheart because her story seemed to be the most tied-in to the game's plot. If/when I do a second run, I will be Team Karlach all the way.
I'm responsible for his actions, but he isn't?
It's more nuanced than that, but generally speaking papal infallibility today only extends to very limited circumstances where the Pope puts on his special papal infallibility hat and says, "I hereby decree..." some specific topic of church law.
A handful of relatives at Thanksgiving wanted to have a conversation/diatribe about what the pope was doing wrong but hey look, I'm gonna go stand over here instead.
You know what your problem is, it's those damn cellphones.
IMO, yes. Near the end of season 1 it starts to become apparent that all those "random" monster-of-the-week occurrences aren't really random, and the plot becomes increasingly more serialized as time goes on.
Damn, what a weird coincidence.
"Cheers was good because it was an ensemble cast, what's the point of making a show just about Frasier? I'm not gonna watch it if there's no Woody or Norm, what would be the point?"
I'm not saying I think this will be as good/better than the first run of Frasier, but people should at least give it a shot before writing it off with the exact same criticism that was leveled against the show they now love when it was announced 30 yrs ago.
Volkditty
joined 1 year ago
~~I guess Doctor Who~~ twitter is now primarily made up of people who hate ~~the show?~~