Why should any of that matter for making transport better in cities where none of this applies
This post is talking exclusively about cities, I'm not sure why this argument about rural areas comes up so often when it's not relevant.
Aren't the figures on the package meant to be net weight though?
It's been done at a town level before, with the same results
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2020/2/19/21112570/universal-basic-income-ubi-map
it could also just be a group of rocks in the shape of a plane
This whole search was as useless as those plane shaped rocks. Wait a minute.. There's a plane behind those rocks!
The reddit api blocking 3rd party apps pushed a whole bunch of people onto lemmy, and lemmy is very big on FOSS and Linux so it's been a gateway of sorts
It's not clear from the way the article quotes him exactly what he said should be "ripped out completely". You seem to be interpreting it as "all city roads should be ripped out completely".
I suspect he's saying we could rip out many city roads, completely turning them into green spaces and with forms of more active transport. I don't think this is saying remove all roads to the extent goods vehicles can't enter.
I feel this will just breed resentmint
Is this guy not public domain yet, I thought that was coming up. Maybe next year? John Oliver did a whole bit on it
So why do they want people's iris scans? Like they say it's an easy way to verify someone signing up is a real person but is there some other nefarious reason I'm missing here?
-2 spooky -4 me
Lisa needs braces