[-] aroom@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

I came to the fediverse in 2017, so nothing to do with reddit or meta or twitter.

The fact is here, we have a choice. So you do you.

On mastodon I have an account on an instance that blocked meta and is using authorised fetch (so the proper way to block a domain) : great, my content won't go there or on any other blocked domains : it's my choice.

I have another account on another instance that didn't blocked meta : great, my content will be shared with threads users and I will be able to browse threads.

Choice, isn't it great?

[-] aroom@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago

yes, on Mastodon when a user block an instance, it's more like a mute than a block. Your posts will still be available to them, but you won't see their content.

The only solution if you want to protect your content from being shared on an instance is to block it at the instance level AND that the instance use Authorised Fetch.

Not all instances have this feature on.

[-] aroom@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I totally understand your point of view and think that your perception is valid. If you try to analyse why you find them preachy and judgemental it could be interesting.

For example would find them so annoying if you agree with them? Is it the discourse that annoys you or the person? Is it your belief system being challenged that annoys you or the facts that are being stated?

It's always intersting to understand why we feel that way when we are challenged, and veganism is one of a few topic that can create what we called in psychology reactance, an interesting topic.

Veganism is really different than religion tho, cause it is totally backed by science (regarding food production, waste issue, C02 and sentientism) and a logic construct.

[-] aroom@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago

human are omnivore, it's a biological trait not a diet. Being omnivore doesn't mean that you need to consume animal products, in the contrary, it means that you can avoid them and still strive, as opposed as carnivore.

own your choices, plain and simple. don't blame other for taking action to reduce suffering, CO2 and waste of ressources.

[-] aroom@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

Apple Music pays two time what Spotify does. Easy pick between the two.

[-] aroom@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago
[-] aroom@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

I’ve read that it doesn’t have e2ee in its specs. Google has a proprietary tweak enabling it but Apple will stick to RSC specs.

Let’s hope that RSC gets e2ee asap.

https://mastodon.social/@daringfireball/111421851053569842

[-] aroom@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

yes. systematic downvoting is a good reason for a ban.

the script excuse is not great, because OP knew they were downvoting content.

[-] aroom@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

upvote or downvote are not good indicator of the quality of a post. a controversial point of view can be of quality but still being downvoted.

[-] aroom@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

if you setup tags for a magazine on kbin, posts being published in the fediverse with those tags end up in the Microblog section. just check it.

1

While rescuers fear for crew, Logitech F710 PC gamepad sells out within minutes.

[-] aroom@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

ok thanks for the precision

0
submitted 1 year ago by aroom@kbin.social to c/kbinMeta@kbin.social

On every thread or post, if you click on more and activity, you'll get the info.

I personally find this to be a good things, I've seen people using downvote way too easily. I like the idea that we need to be somehow accountable for those mechanism.

edit: It could be somehow improved to have an option to let this info only available between concerned users.

edit edit: I think that up/downvote info shouldn't be public, but kept private between the users involved. we need to address this privacy issue.

view more: next ›

aroom

joined 2 years ago