What a joke, can't believe people still voluntarily use this OS by b_van_b in c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
[-] b_van_b@programming.dev 21 points 1 month ago

I had a similar error with a different application. Clicking "Get help with this" just opened the Documents folder in Explorer.

Grinding down open source maintainers with AI by b_van_b in c/programming@programming.dev
7 Programming Myths that waste your time | Fireship by b_van_b in c/programming@programming.dev
[-] b_van_b@programming.dev 41 points 10 months ago
  1. You need to use the latest tech to stay relevant
  2. Aim for maximum theoretical purity or pattern adherence
  3. You must adhere to Uncle Bob's clean code rules at all times
  4. 100% code coverage is something that matters
  5. You should always optimize for performance
  6. You should always optimize for web scale
  7. AI is about to replace all programmers
Falsehoods programmers believe about languages by b_van_b in c/programming@programming.dev
[-] b_van_b@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Many examples are listed on Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphabetical_order#Language-specific_conventions

For French, the last accent in a given word determines the order.[14] For example, in French, the following four words would be sorted this way: cote < côte < coté < côté. The letter e is ordered as e é è ê ë (œ considered as oe), same thing for o as ô ö.

I asked the Linux Community to RANK 34 DISTROS, here are the results! by b_van_b in c/linux@programming.dev
[-] b_van_b@programming.dev 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Additionally, PopOS and Garuda were polled, but didn't appear in the final list. Based on the spreadsheet provided, PopOS should be #16 and Garuda should be #24.

Place Distro Average Score Has been Tried
1 SteamOS 4.19 27%
2 Fedora 4.18 65%
3 Arch Linux 4.04 60%
4 Bazzite 4.04 15%
5 Linux Mint 4.03 73%
6 Endeavour OS 3.92 31%
7 CachyOS 3.87 11%
8 Asahi Linux 3.84 7%
9 Fedora Silverblue 3.77 18%
10 Nobara 3.73 22%
11 Alpine 3.71 19%
12 OpenSUSETumbleweed 3.67 29%
13 Debian Stable 3.63 63%
14 Debian Testing 3.63 23%
15 NixOS 3.52 23%
16 PopOS 3.41 49%
17 Tuxedo OS 3.36 10%
18 Gentoo 3.26 16%
19 Ubuntu 3.23 88%
20 MX Linux 3.14 16%
21 Linux lite 3.13 9%
22 Puppy Linux 3.13 16%
23 OpenSUSE Leap 3.11 19%
24 Garuda Linux 3.09 18%
25 Slackware 3.00 10%
26 Peppermint 2.99 9%
27 ZorinOS 2.94 29%
28 Vanilla OS 2.93 13%
29 KDE Neon 2.85 30%
30 Rhino Linux 2.83 4%
31 Mageia 2.81 4%
32 Solus 2.74 9%
33 elementary OS 2.71 28%
34 Manjaro 2.64 53%
35 Chrome OS Flex 2.03 21%
36 Deepin 1.97 15%
My ~$2700 ThinkPad is worth $650 re Lenovo by b_van_b in c/linux@programming.dev
[-] b_van_b@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

How did you calculate $1200 from this?

How I date by b_van_b in c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
[-] b_van_b@programming.dev 14 points 2 years ago

I assume it's because many people outside the USA are accustomed to taking off their shoes when entering a house or apartment.

Circle C++: C++ superset to add Memory Safety based on Rust's borrow checking by b_van_b in c/programming_languages@programming.dev
[-] b_van_b@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

What's the image? I just get an error message.

evil-helix: A super fast modal editor with Vim keybindings by b_van_b in c/programming@programming.dev
The GitHub Black Market That Helps Coders Cheat the Popularity Contest by b_van_b in c/programming@programming.dev
[-] b_van_b@programming.dev 21 points 2 years ago

I use stars to keep a list of repositories I'm interested in. You can even put them in different categories, like browser bookmarks.

OC: Me since Bun 1.0.0 by b_van_b in c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
[-] b_van_b@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

Why did deno fade?

Large language models, explained with a minimum of math and jargon by b_van_b in c/programming@programming.dev
[-] b_van_b@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

Click on the star next to the share icon.

-3
Linux has nearly half of the desktop OS Linux market (www.theregister.com)
submitted 2 years ago by b_van_b@programming.dev to c/linux@programming.dev
1 comments fedilink
18
Is a dereferenced reference not equal to the original variable? (programming.dev)
submitted 2 years ago by b_van_b@programming.dev to c/rust@programming.dev
2 comments fedilink

I'm going through the interactive version of The Book, and I'm confused by the results of an exercise in Ch 4.3 - Fixing Ownership Errors.

The following code does not work, and they say it's because it would result in the same heap space being deallocated twice:

fn main() {
    let s = String::from("Hello world");
    let s_ref = &s; // reference s
    let s2 = *s_ref; // dereference s_ref
    println!("{s2}");
}

But in my mind, this should be equivalent to the following compilable code, which transfers ownership of s to s2 :

fn main() {
    let s = String::from("Hello world");
    let s_ref = &s; // reference s
    let s2 = s; // move s directly
    println!("{s2}");
}

If s_ref is a reference to s, then dereferencing s_ref should return the String s, shouldn't it? Why can't s be moved to s2 with either the above code or let s2 = *&s;, which fails in the same way?

view more: next ›

b_van_b

joined 2 years ago