Yes, I attribute security significant misconfigurations to a lag between new service deployments and a relevant review by network security (in a business environment. At home it's just me.)

So I'm running Milestone VMS, Synology NAS and maybe in a day a minecraft server for the kids, which should all be available outside my home. I'm using the mikrotik HexPOE which is my main router/firewall.

Very little is changing over time... I have a proliant salvage server running proxmox with some hosts and the router only port forwards to an NGINX proxy manager instance for the web interfaces on those hosts. I run a synology NAS separate from the proliant hardware that runs through the proxy.

I know I don't understand it all, and i'm open to suggestions.

NOPE

I'm willing to understand the operating paradigm of other people. This is the modus operandi of the US. They have motivations that they SHOULD dissuade themselves from being influenced by, but that doesn't make a difference in how the world currently is, or what currently motivates them.

You can conflate in your head what is and what should be, but that just frustrates real attempts to making the world closer to what it should be.

This reductionism on your part is disrespectful.

aHHHHHHHHhhhhHHHHhhh

https://www.cfr.org/article/us-aid-israel-four-charts

Notice that there has been a historical level of USA investment in isreal. This year, when isreal decided to paint a target on themselves, it gave the USA a choice of tripling down or lose a significant level of force projection in the middle east. Losing that would ALSO sabotage the democrats campaign. The USA as a cultural whole is responsible for genocides in all the regions it has dumped money into. Maintaining the institution of the US is integral to the security and wellbeing of many people that live outside the USA.

it is NOT anti-anarchism to point out that geopolitics is a series of hostage situations, which several people are trying to convey to you.

YOU ARE in a position of power, and i'm mad at YOU because you are using that power in an irresponsible way. YOU have put moral responsibility on the hostages.

It's not a few memes. It's an aggregate that you are contributing to. You are aware that there are state actors that are attempting to influence the US election, and your post is in line with the messaging from those campaigns.

And then you are demanding no assenting opinions.

I would be more worried about giving him ideas if I didn't think he was a puppet operated by REITs

Edit implying puppets don't have ideas

You do have an insignificant effect on the world. It's not nothing. People read your words and hear you, and form opinions.

Decrying the choice of paying the ransom is arguing for abstention.

I did not do that. I said this:

You do know that Trump is a racist idiot, and will likely do things or neglect to do things, and that will result in higher civilian casualties everywhere? Dude handled COVID in a way that increased deaths. You think an armed conflict will be handled better? You have a choice between two things. Abstaining just favors one thing.

IDGAF about Harris. Abstaining favors the choice that represents an existential threat for MORE people. Recommending martyrdom instead of reducing losses makes you a saboteur for anarchism. Stop it. Accept that people have a risk profile that won't tolerate uncompromising principles. We need people to participate, rejecting moderate allies is a bad choice.

I don't think you really are willing to understand that most people are viewing that election as a hostage situation. I'm Canadian. It's plain as day. Forced participation is not consent, and you should know that!

It's code for a minimum of bike storage space to be included in new construction, so money is being wasted on storage space if cycling infrastructure is not implemented.

https://www.toronto.ca/zoning/bylaw_amendments/ZBL_NewProvision_Chapter230.htm

Any opinion on Mikrotik?