[-] bear@slrpnk.net 17 points 5 months ago

People really be out here preloading their computer with viruses to get around Microsoft's latest bullshit instead of just using Linux, we ain't never gonna have the Year of the Linux Desktop

[-] bear@slrpnk.net 19 points 8 months ago

This feature unironically turned me from a decade long Samsung hater into a Samsung shill. The fact that it's still not in base Android is just embarrassing.

[-] bear@slrpnk.net 18 points 11 months ago

I assume doog is the opposite of good, in which case I agree

[-] bear@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

because of the check against darkweb leaks or whatever type feature when you pay. That's seems like an anti privacy thing. I understand it's a good idea albeit seems to expose a lot of information about you

For the password leak checks, your passwords are never transmitted. They are one-way hashed locally, and then only the first few characters of the hash are checked against the API provided at https://haveibeenpwned.com which is run and designed by Troy Hunt, one of the most respected people in the cybersecurity industry. He collects major password breaches and makes them available to check against without actually exposing the data. It's perfectly safe and secure.

[-] bear@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 year ago

Please, leaves

[-] bear@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 year ago

Anarchism is less a system of functions to be implemented, and more of a governing philosophy on how we build other systems. That philosophy focuses heavily on the expansion of democracy and the elimination of hierarchy wherever possible in order to create the most total freedom in the system. It is not inherently opposed to the concepts of governance or laws as many believe. It usually means focusing on smaller governing units, preferring local governance wherever possible, to give people the most direct control over their own lives. Self-sufficient communities are a major goal here.

The meaning of freedom to an anarchist is wholistic; not just freedom to, but also freedom from. Freedom to pursue your life on your terms, freedom from any obligation or inhibition that would prevent or detract from that goal. This includes, for example, unconditional freedom for all people from starvation, homelessness, or the inability to access medical care. It is an intentionally utopian ideal, that we should strive for something that may not even be possible, because that is how we'll create the best possible world.

Once upon a time, anarchism was effectively synonymous with libertarianism. That word was bastardized in America to the point that it is unrecognizable now.

[-] bear@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 year ago

I agree entirely. You should live ethically because it's the right thing to do, and the fact that it won't save the entire world on its own shouldn't be an excuse not to. That there's so much leftist pushback on this idea of maintaining your ethics in your personal life is really disheartening. Consumption really is a mind virus that is determined to keep you hooked, even among those who should know better.

If we can't maintain our ethics in the small bubble that is our own lives, how exactly do we intend to maintain them on a societal level? And if you don't respect nature now, why should I expect you to start respecting it after we change some laws? Start now, at least for some of it. You're gonna have to do all of this eventually anyways. So what do you have to lose?

[-] bear@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 year ago

Nvidia shipping proprietary code is what makes it worse for people who actually use Linux. They should open source their driver.

[-] bear@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 year ago

Ah, but the libs are in my computer, which means I own the libs. Checkmate.

[-] bear@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 year ago

I've used both, each for a long stretch of time; they are fundamentally extremely similar and you'll be fine with either. I switched to AdGuard Home entirely because I could run it directly from my OPNSense router instead of a second machine. There isn't really anything else major I've noticed different between them, but my usage is fairly basic. AdGuard's interface felt a bit more mature and clean, but that's it.

If you're happy with your PiHole, there's no reason I'm aware of to switch.

[-] bear@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The ability to reuse electronics for new purposes until they stop working to the point that they're irreparable or otherwise no longer fit for purpose. You can do a LOT with old computers and hardware, and you can often resurrect "broken" things relatively easily, if you can find parts. However, sometimes you do have to weigh this against the energy costs some old stuff has relative to new stuff if you don't have direct access to your own renewables.

My entire home network infrastructure is built out of old, repurposed, and/or second-hand equipment. My router is a broken netbook running OPNSense, my switch is an older Cisco small business switch. I picked up a used couple year old used consumer router and put OpenWRT on it and run it as a standalone access point. It supports Wifi 6, and I expect it to last at least a decade. The only thing I bought new was my modem a few years ago, because I refuse to rent from the ISP.

More directly relevant though is that I'm using an old low power (formerly) Windows 8 tablet from 2014 to run Home Assistant, which I'm using to optimize my energy usage bit by bit. It's a slow process because I don't want to run out and buy new stuff until existing stuff stops working, but I'm slowly expanding my network to observe my energy usage and put in place automation to reduce usage where it makes no sense to waste energy.

One thing I'd like to expand into is actually learning to solder and picking up some basic electrical engineering skills. So far this has mainly been hobbyist, replacing only parts with connectors. I'd like to be able to do even more.

[-] bear@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 year ago

It has one of the same inherent inefficiencies as animal meat: they need to eat something to grow. Therefore we need to use a lot of resources to produce a lot of food for them to eat, before we can eat them.

It always seems much more efficient to use those resources to grow food for us to eat directly. Also, getting Americans to eat a vegetable is slightly easier than getting them to eat a bug.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

bear

joined 1 year ago