hey freedomtools. I'm a fan of your site btw.
just seemed funny.
what do you mean by
corruption ?
surely it's fine to question players in the space, nay, interrogate to get a better idea of whats going on
I called out allark previously. tbh I don't know majestic
don't forget to vote!
you're more free that way
real handy this one
now we just need more users
they got something done - how many people got a good service out of coinjoins?
plus they likely awoke many to the problem of ensuring privacy online - particularly in finance, and particularly in crypto
PS: This is good for Monero - sweats profusely
neither of those sites work
This one was super interesting.
Have been looking at Monero based voting systems for a while as I think it's a distinctly lacking application of cryptographic technologies.
do check out the website : cryptopoll.org
[It's not "Monero based" but it copy and pastes the ring signature part of the code as the basis for a voting mechanism - each participant's PGP signature joins a total ring and creates a validating but obfuscating voting mechanism]
super lame, but interesting!
does someone who is capable of a massive attack on XMR actually believe that lightning is the answer? skeptical.
it also reminds me of the suspicious mempool flood in BTC in 2015 - https://bitcoinwiki.org/wiki/july-2015-flood-attack
Lots of MAGA and alt types are aware of CBDCs - Monero is the best tool to fight central control of finance. Many influencers are aware.
Also enough decentralised framework is there for wallet provision etc. I needn't tell you but the more Monero is attacked, the more gooder it becomes
Zcash on the other hand is going ham bone on implementing public address only features for binance
but the chips are still stacked against..
well done for replying
yes LLaMA got leaked and has opened up a tool for the people. I see the project openLLaMA making headway in putting out a chatbot 'for the people' as opposed to the centralised control. don't confuse it with LLaMA 2, a confab between mta and mcrosoft which is 'open source' but you have to let them have all of your data. seems to be an effort at damage control and to try and still harvest some of the data that people are shovelling into machine learning programs these days. I personally don't think they're great at all, far from intelligent and I think they're going to be bad for humanity down the line. but pandora's box is open so we might as well democratise by at least breaking the corporate chokehold on A"I".
must have mixed up your site with another that had online privacy guides
sounds a bit paranoid to be fair
once again i don't know majestic and have no interest.
but I know Tux is a solid guy, I trust his opinion. he's also a busy guy - I don't think there's an international conspiracy paying random small-time accounts to occasionally bash the reputation of a dodgy exchange. or that the exchange is so good and unique that it attracts the ire of bigger powers, it seems very unlikely to me.
are you pro-majestic? if so, can you make an iron man case for the exchange?
once again, I don't actually care about majestic but I'm interested that good info is being passed around the community - particularly at this pivotal era where exchanges are key