[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 12 points 2 months ago

The under-acknowledged Rule Zero for all this is that the Sequences were always cult shit. They were not intended to explain Solomonoff induction in the way that a textbook would, so that the reader might learn to reason about the concept. Instead, the ploy was to rig the game: Present the desired conclusion as the "simplest", pretend that "simplicity" is quantifiable, assert that scientists are insufficiently Rational(TM) because they reject the quantifiably "simplest" answer... School bad, blog posts good, tithe to MIRI.

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 12 points 5 months ago

Demonstrating once again that Twitter is the damp locker-room floor of ideas.

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 12 points 1 year ago

You are not worth responding to. Goodbye.

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 12 points 1 year ago

oh lordy, there's a whole post

Why did evolution give most males so much testosterone instead of making low-T nerds? Obviously testosterone makes you horny and buff.

"Compared to me, 78% of the human male population are low-T betas" —Hbomberguy

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 11 points 1 year ago

This is why my crimes.txt file just contains the recipes that I really should not try making, like Jake Morgendorffer's chile con cheesepuffs with fresh mint, and my actual crime plans are in... oh ho, I see what you did there, you clever jack-a-napes!

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 11 points 1 year ago

We should have known the English rain was trouble when it started giving people tans

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 12 points 1 year ago

and moreover, wat

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 12 points 1 year ago

Consistent content that helps support people in their everyday lives [...] Just “selected Sequences reading and discussion” could be a reasonable format.

Bible study. You've reinvented Bible study.

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 11 points 2 years ago

lakes and seas of people

clearly the AI is going to hug us all and then we turn into TANG

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 12 points 2 years ago

I begin to believe that some people literally do not have senses of humor with which to distinguish impossible statements meant nonseriously from seriously.

"It's everyone else's fault they don't recognize me as a genius," said the dork ass loser

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Apropos:

Musk, the boy, loved video games and computers and Dungeons & Dragons and “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy,” and he still does. “I took from the book that we need to extend the scope of consciousness so that we are better able to ask the questions about the answer, which is the universe,” Musk tells Isaacson. Isaacson doesn’t raise an eyebrow, and you can wonder whether he has read “Hitchhiker’s Guide,” or listened to the BBC 4 radio play on which it is based, first broadcast in 1978. It sounds like this:

Far back in the mists of ancient time, in the great and glorious days of the former galactic empire, life was wild, rich, and, on the whole, tax free. . . . Many men of course became extremely rich, but this was perfectly natural because no one was really poor, at least, no one worth speaking of.

“The Hitchhiker’s Guide” is not a book about how “we need to extend the scope of consciousness so that we are better able to ask the questions about the answer, which is the universe.” It is, among other things, a razor-sharp satiric indictment of imperialism:

And for these extremely rich merchants life eventually became rather dull, and it seemed that none of the worlds they settled on was entirely satisfactory. Either the climate wasn’t quite right in the later part of the afternoon or the day was half an hour too long or the sea was just the wrong shade of pink. And thus were created the conditions for a staggering new form of industry: custom-made, luxury planet-building.

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 11 points 2 years ago

Likewise, Arthur Chu recently tweeted that he’s “unhappy about [my] continued existence”–i.e., on a straightforward reading, that he wants me to die.

The tweet was a reply to Aaronson saying (in part),

Far be it from me to psychoanalyze him, as he constantly does to me, but Chu's unremitting viciousness doesn't strike me as coming from a place of any great happiness with his life. So I say: may even Mr. Chu find whatever he's looking for.

To which Chu replied,

I am unhappy about many things, including the continued existence, wealth and social status afforded to men like you, and the cheesy sentimentality is not reciprocated

I.e., on a straightforward reading, he was talking about "existence" in the sense of lifestyle, not life. (The OED gives "sheltered existence" as an example of this meaning, which I find apt.)

view more: ‹ prev next ›

blakestacey

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF