In Australia they’re now called ‘intentional communities’. That might help with searching. Some are religious but some are not. Quite a few are just science/sustainability based.
Mediawatch showed something disturbing: Murdoch papers have been actively campaigning for the bill for the last six months. I wonder why? https://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/episodes/teens/104644976
What about semantics?
“Nothing is better than cake."
“But bread is better than nothing.
"Does that mean that bread is better than cake?”
Anything that starts with ‘aww’
We donate to Wikipedia once per year.
They don’t give a definition of ‘incomplete’ or ‘faulty’? Is that on purpose?
Interesting article.
“Instead of passing a law preventing civilians from carrying weapons of war, they enacted a rule prohibiting spectators from carrying small signs into meetings.”
“Americans, whether they own a gun or don’t, want guns kept out of the hands of dangerous and unstable people. Americans, whether they vote for Republicans or Democrats, don’t want children to be blasted into bits at their school desks. As we have lately learned here in Tennessee, that’s a lot of common ground.”
I hope everyone got to the point in the article where Top Blokes is mentioned because that’s a good news story.
Umm… correlation vs causation?? Anyone??
Angry upvote you brilliant bastard!
bpalmerau
joined 2 years ago
@sh.itjust.works Yes it does, whether you want it to or not