At least twice before, Thomas has similarly defended his failure to make required disclosures as an unintentional error or a misunderstanding of the rules.
Seems like the only possible explanations are that he's lying or he's incompetent.
Even in 2016 it was obvious what kind of person he was. His "good" supporters claimed that being President would change him for the better. We all knew then that they were wrong. We all know now that they were lying.
That's not how the courts work here.
I tend to support this idea. If inputting copyrighted materials isn't infringement then neither should taking the output be.
Alternate future Admiral Janeway doesn't qualify.
Prime timeline Admiral Janeway might qualify if only because we never see her do anything.
I don't usually approve of courts making examples of people, but the court needs to make an example of this guy.
And/or the Logan Act.
The enshittification of Windows continues apace.
Do not insert directly into the ear
Impeachment is an empty threat at this point. He might not even show up if it goes to trial.
She has always known what kind of person Trump is; he's not exactly subtle. And she supported him anyway, even to the point of committing serious crimes in his name. The only difference now is that she is facing consequences.
charonn0
joined 2 years ago
35
https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-investigations/election-certification-under-threat/