[-] cloudless@feddit.uk 3 points 7 months ago

This is impressive!

Is one of them supposed to be a double?

[-] cloudless@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago

I just heard the Windows XP startup sound.

[-] cloudless@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Super Mario Galaxy

Final Fantasy VI

[-] cloudless@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago

There is a video on youtube explaining the effort put into programming Balloon Fight to improve the controls.

[-] cloudless@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago

This one is just called Pinball, it is a first-party Nintendo game.

I love NES pinball. I do not like pinball games with realistic physics (too fast and too difficult). This one feels more like a game instead of a real pinball machine. Also, this one has a bonus stage with Mario in it.

I also like how clear and bright the visuals are. Too many newer pinball games are cluttered and flashy.

Space Cadet and NES pinball are my favourite video pinball games of all time.

[-] cloudless@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago
[-] cloudless@feddit.uk 3 points 9 months ago

Bing AI:

This is a very profound and complex question that has been debated for centuries by philosophers, theologians, scientists, and ordinary people. There is no definitive answer that can satisfy everyone, as different people have different definitions of God, evidence, and faith. However, there are some common arguments that have been proposed for and against the existence of God, based on reason, experience, or revelation. Here are some of them:

The cosmological argument: This argument claims that everything that exists has a cause, and since the universe exists, it must have a cause too. This cause is God, who is the first and uncaused cause of everything else. Some versions of this argument also appeal to the principle of sufficient reason, which says that everything that exists has a reason or explanation for its existence, and God is the ultimate reason for the existence of the universe12. The ontological argument: This argument claims that God is the greatest possible being that can be conceived, and since it is greater to exist than not to exist, God must exist. This argument is based on the idea of God itself, rather than on any empirical evidence or observation12. The teleological argument: This argument claims that the universe shows signs of design, order, and purpose, and therefore implies the existence of a designer, who is God. This argument is based on the observation of the natural world and its features, such as the laws of physics, the complexity of life, and the fine-tuning of the constants that make the universe habitable123. The moral argument: This argument claims that there is an objective moral law that governs human actions, and that this moral law can only come from a moral lawgiver, who is God. This argument is based on the experience of morality and conscience, and the recognition of universal values and duties12. The argument from religious experience: This argument claims that some people have direct or personal experiences of God, such as visions, miracles, revelations, or mystical encounters, and that these experiences provide evidence for the existence of God. This argument is based on the testimony of individuals or communities who claim to have encountered God in some way12. Of course, these arguments are not conclusive or uncontroversial, and there are many objections and counterarguments that can be raised against them. Some of the common challenges to the existence of God are:

The problem of evil: This challenge claims that the existence of evil, suffering, and injustice in the world is incompatible with the existence of an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God. If God exists, why does he allow so much pain and misery to afflict his creatures? How can he be both omnipotent and benevolent?12 The argument from nonbelief: This challenge claims that the existence of God is not evident or obvious to everyone, and that there are many sincere and rational people who do not believe in God or any religion. If God exists, why does he not make himself more clear and convincing to his potential followers? How can he be both omniscient and loving?12 The argument from parsimony: This challenge claims that the existence of God is not necessary or justified by the available evidence, and that there are simpler and more natural explanations for the phenomena that are attributed to God. If God exists, why does he not intervene more often and directly in the world? How can he be both transcendent and immanent?123 As you can see, the question of whether there is evidence of God is not a simple or straightforward one, and it depends on many factors, such as the definition of God, the criteria of evidence, the interpretation of the data, and the personal worldview and beliefs of the person asking or answering the question. Ultimately, the answer may depend on faith, which is not a matter of proof or logic, but of trust and commitment. I hope this answer has given you some insight into the main arguments and challenges that are involved in this fascinating and important topic. Thank you for your question.

[-] cloudless@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Does youtube work with noscript at all?

[-] cloudless@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

🎶 Both a little scared

Neither one prepared

[-] cloudless@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Oddly infuriating.

[-] cloudless@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

... and the final photo from OP (j/k)

Wonderful photo. I would be too nervous getting so close to a wasp.

[-] cloudless@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Why don't you open your mind and be skeptical with your sources?

We simply don’t know the long-term effects of radiation, so why risk it by watching your food cook in your microwave day after day and night after night?

Microwave radiation does not have any long-term effects on your health or food quality. Microwave ovens use non-ionizing radiation, which does not damage cells or DNA. Microwave radiation is also contained within the oven and does not leak out. Therefore, there is no risk of watching your food cook in your microwave.

https://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/what-to-microwave-ovens-health

Tissues directly exposed to microwaves are subject to the same deformities molecules go through, and this can in turn cause you to experience “microwave sickness”. Remember, it isn’t just microwave ovens which emit this kind of radiation.

Microwave ovens do not expose tissues to microwaves, as they are shielded and contained within the oven. Microwave ovens use non-ionizing radiation, which does not cause deformities in molecules or cells.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26556835/

Microwaving food, in effect, potentially destroys and depletes the life energy, rendering the food completely dead and lifeless. In addition, the food’s nutritional value is lost and it becomes nearly useless in terms of providing any real health benefit.

Microwaving food does not affect its nutritional value negatively, as long as it is cooked properly and with minimal water. In fact, microwaving food can preserve some nutrients better than other cooking methods, such as boiling or frying, because it reduces the exposure to heat and water.

https://www.drberg.com/blog/do-microwaves-actually-lower-your-nutrients-in-food

Vitamin C in asparagus spears was lost during a 1999 Scandinavian study.

This is not unique to microwaving, as any cooking method that involves heat and water can have the same effect. In fact, microwaving food can preserve more vitamin C than boiling or frying, because it uses less water and shorter cooking times.

https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/microwave-cooking-and-nutrition

Microwaving Food Leads to a Negative Impact on Human Physiology & the Heart

The Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, which issued a press release in 1992 stating that Hertel’s study was not scientifically valid and that there was no evidence that microwaved food was harmful to health.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

cloudless

joined 1 year ago