I've started the habit of using spoiler tags to collapse tangents when I go overboard at times. It makes it easier for me to scroll past, so I'd assume it's also easier for people who aren't actively engaging with my posts to deal with.

I did read the article. Checking is not and should not be their responsibility.

The only legitimate way to check is to do actual, intensive, independent testing of every device in question, specific to your country's regulations. Spec sheets are not a valid approach to verifying that a device will work.

Regulatory compliance of hardware is not, and should not be, the responsibility of the service provider. It's the responsibility of the manufacturer to have their hardware certified basically everywhere.

Frankly, the rules shouldn't even allow providers to make that determination. They should either be certified to meet the requirements by an independent agency, or have providers be prohibited from allowing them.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 hours ago

Just days ahead of the shutdown, Australia's media regulator ACMA finalised a new "direction" (basically a rule) that meant telecom companies had to refuse service to all phones that relied on 3G for making emergency calls.

The idea was to prevent people from mistakenly believing that phones were fully working, only to realise they were unable to make emergency calls when the crucial moment came.

Australians with older 4G phones may also be caught out because of the way the phones are configured.

It is up to the telcos to work out which phones are affected, notify the owners, block their phones, and help make other arrangements such as low- or no-cost replacement phones.

However, as Telstra and Optus noted during a Senate inquiry into the shutdown, telecom companies are unable to tell which individual devices suffer from this problem unless have they sold them.

I'm not saying it's not partly on the providers, but validating that a bunch of obscure phones that aren't sold in your country meet new regulatory requirements is not as easy as you're making it out to be.

It doesn't hold up. It pushed the envelope, but of a very early field with very limited tech.

3D gameplay has evolved way too much. It takes a remake to make the game mechanics still feel fun.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 23 points 11 hours ago

Sell DLC that isn't just a bullshit cash grab and people will buy it.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 76 points 12 hours ago

The crazy part is the "stripped down" was still relatively modest. She was in underwear and bra, but they covered a hell of a lot more than most people wear to the beach in a lot of the world.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 6 points 12 hours ago

SteamOS is arch, so some of the derivatives are too.

Steam shouldn't really care though.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 13 points 14 hours ago

I get bodily autonomy and why it should be a firm line you don't cross (despite the same people thinking you should spend eternity in prison if you don't want to be an incubator for 9 months or smoke a plant), but I really wish we could charge all the people that deliberately infected people with Covid by going in public without getting a simple safe shot with manslaughter.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Seriously, clearing snow isn't just for your visibility. It's illegal here (and presumably other places) to leave any snow at all on your car because it will come off and is very likely to affect the visibility of another driver at high speeds.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 21 points 16 hours ago

Stopping takes longer. Drive slower; leave more space to stop.

You'd think it's common sense, but a huge number of the accidents in winter are because people drive like idiots.

They could have always supported software for that long. They simply refused to.

There is no benefit to slowing the release cycle. All of the research gets done either way, all of the supply chain modifications get made either way, and as an individual you have no need to replace your phone every year. A multi-year release cycle does very little but screw over people who need a new phone during the wrong point in the release cycle, while also substantially complicating the supply chains by making demand much spikier.

view more: next ›

conciselyverbose

joined 8 months ago