[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago

Most of them are, thats not the point.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 days ago

I don't understand people compaing a mesh network to simple wireguard. It is not the same.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago

China wants so see all our clients browser history in order for their secret AI to produce exactly what we want to buy next as cheap and fast as possible. World domination secured.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 days ago

Thats quite the "theory". Also I am still failing to see the motivation? "just kill some muslims" and sacrifice some of our own for that?

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 days ago

So basically Hamas is an inside job in order for Israel to exterminate innocent people? And the reasoning for that is...? I guess 7th October was also a self made incident?

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 1 week ago

Taking funding from your biggest competitor is a weird business choice.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 2 months ago

no dotted zeroes = no terminal use

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 6 months ago

Not written in rust, yuck! 😆

55
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by dino@discuss.tchncs.de to c/gaming@beehaw.org

So yeah, I want to discuss or point out why I think Valve needs to fix Anti-Cheat issues. They have VAC but apparently its doing jackshit, be it Counter Strike 2 (any previous iterations) or something like Hunt: Showdown the prevalence of cheating players is non deniable. For me personally it has come to a point that I am not enjoying playing those games anymore, although they are great games by itself. But the amount of occurrences being killed or playing against cheaters is at a height, where I don't see the point anymore.

  • Why I think Valve is the only company able to something against cheaters?

Because they have the tools with VAC already aiming to prevent cheaters. Valve has got the resources to actually invest into something more profound which could be used for any game where anti-cheat protection needs to be implemented. And lastly Valve is the company which is interested in furthering the ability to gaming on Linux, the anti-cheat solution needs to work on both operating systems. Only Valve has the motivation and means to achieve that with their knowledge and resources. What do you guys think about the topic? Is the fight against cheaters hopeless? Do you think some other entity should provide anti-cheat protection, why? I skimmed over "anti cheat in linux kernel" posts in the net, but I have very little knowledge about the topic, what is your stance on it?

Edited: Mixed EAC with VAC. EAC seems to be part of Epic Company. Both of these tools seem unable to prevent cheating like mentioned above.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

custom windows that rarely gets update...

sounds like an amazing idea.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 1 year ago

Just found this too, through the rust post some days ago...but its quite obvious that from a usability context that btop is easier to use. With bottom you have to memorize all hotkeys wheres btop is showing them right in the interface.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 year ago

Alpine was never meant as a desktop distribution.

view more: next ›

dino

joined 1 year ago