[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

I don't understand the question?

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Can you also give arguments to your opinion?

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago
[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Isn't this actually impossible because manpages are maintained by distros? And the benefit of freedbsd being everything is created by the same team? Aka FreeBSD being a complete distro and not just a kernel?

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

I agree here, although I have no clue why it looks so different.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Thanks for the write up, for me as a sysadmin it just doesn't hold enough attraction on why I should make a switch. We are not going to change our infrastructure to NixOS. And for workstation use, I don't see the benefit.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

So how many debian packages with firefox are now available? debian sid, stable, testing & firefox nightly?

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Appimage? So we go behave like windows users?

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Another WM? What differentiates swayfx from hyprland? Also why do you call it compositor, when it actually seems to be a sway fork?

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

No. Debian package update status is annoying. And I am on testing...on top of that, apt is decent but I don't see anything special about it.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Only downside is lack of documentation for distro specifics. You need to adapt docs for Arch on Tumbleweed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

dino

joined 1 year ago