[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

Hades Baldur's Gate 3 Witcher 3 Dark Souls 3 Elden Ring Path of Exile II Zelda Breath of the Wild (Switch II?) Z BotW II

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago

First sane comment here.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago

So funny that almost nobody got certs working in IT, same for me basically, I have a BA in Business Administration and thats it. ^^;

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago

I use riverwm on my private laptop, which I don't use regularly. My biggest problem is its departure from ordinary WMs way of starting itself. I think this causes quite some issues with dbus sessions etc. which are troublesome to fix.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

then the legend should be fixed its confusing, as is the whole idea of FHS is outdated and a chore for new users to get into (i still don't fully understand it)

  • difference between /media and /mnt
  • wtf is /run? some glorified /temp?
  • /usr/sbin "non vital system binaries" ... aha ok, whatever don't tell me you understand the difference between 6 (SIX !) differen bin/sbin folders
  • could continue forever...
[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 months ago

I’ve been considering Opensuse, but last time I used zypper it was painfully slow. Has it gotten any better?

No, I am using TW for years and despise its package manager slowness. Apart from that though, TW is great. Have void on my laptop as well, sadly rarely use it currently.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

codeberg: KISS

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

pros:

  • very good defaults, btrfs with snapper integration like no other distro (i know of)
  • up to date packages
  • zypper is amazingly easy to use and understand (zypper dup, upgrades your whole system, one command done)
  • if you need GUI tools to configure stuff, YAST

cons:

  • worse documentation compared to Arch
  • not the fastest packet manager
  • a lot of unnecessary packages (not as lightweight)
  • solutions for problems are not as widespread on the internet (a bit similar to first con)
  • imo weird naming of official repos, also packman being almost required
  • https://build.opensuse.org/ is kind of like AUR with automatic QC, but you have to add repos for each package which makes keeping track a hassle

Still if you want to hop around I think you HAVE to try Tumbleweed for an extended period of time, because you will come only to appreciate something like rolling release + seamless integration of snapper once you hit those road bumps. I also think arch is the way, be it in its vanilla form or something like endeavouros. But maybe you should gather some experience beforehand. Btw. I am using Tumbleweed on my personal (gaming) desktop for almost 10 years now. I am at a point where I want to switch, but at the same time feel so comfortable that I am not sure its worth the effort.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

I installed it just yesterday on a test machine

Hmmm.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

One downside of Opensuse compared to Arch is its lacking Documentation.

I use Opensuse TW on my desktop machine for over 10 years now and I use Debian at work, also have a different distro on my laptop.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

Because you are just looking for an email provider: https://disroot.org/en (donation financed) Otherwise there are paid providers which are based in germany: mailbox.org or posteo.de

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

Is this sarcasm?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

dino

joined 1 year ago