Sweet, Hotznplotzn, already more clever than the crap you cited further up. I don't have the energy or time now to clean up after you again, of course that makes things easier for you.

But a neo-con FDP think tank with a dissident from the times of the attempted Hong Kong colour revolution as the author of the report, good stuff, good stuff.

Interesting that you always dig up people supported by the West. Is that about the same as when people here are supported by Russia or China, or doesn't that work in this direction because those are our enemies after all?

Everybody really should know by now what "freedom" (Freiheit) means to the FDP (neo-con liberal party with 3,5 %), namely FUCK THE POOR AND WORKERS, MAKE WAY FOR CAPITAL. And that's why we should, of course, treat any report about an ideologically different nation state that such a foundation shits out with the credibility you would like us to.

I would love to support such dissidents, if they weren't always so conspicuous with their capitalist freedom fantasies.

Lol, that's like a report that you'd find in similar kind in any country. Pretty sure any reporting on that would be from a source that you as a chauvinist, sinophobic propagandist would dismiss. Point being, this fucker got caught. And you are a propagandist and should be permabanned.

I’m not necessarily agreeing with the head chopping part on a general basis, but consider this:

If you become wealthy (which is a nebulous term, but w/e) in this system you automatically gain power over the life of other people, while you yourself break free from being forced into laboring for others. You are not going to spend it all on consumables, so you will likely use it to pay other people to do stuff for you, that you either can’t be bothered to do yourself or are not skilled to do yourself. So you’ll be able to live off of the labor of others, less fortunate. You are extracting value from them, maybe even creating some kind of dependency through the power imbalance.

TL;DR: Share your wealth or get fucked, parasite ;)

(and no, extracting value for your personal benefit is not sharing)

E: So, it’s more of: do you have the means to free yourself from labor, while at the same time you exploit the people that don’t have that freedom, then your wealth becomes a problem and through your wealth you do become a problem for the working class.

He designated cartels as foreign terrorist organizations through executive order on his inauguration day and also invoked the Alien Enemies Act. So ya, that actually was on the table since January.

Clip of his inauguration speech

Executive order: Designating Cartels And Other Organizations As Foreign Terrorist Organizations And Specially Designated Global Terrorists

Alien Enemies Act of 1798

Holy disinformation, dude, wtf!

Being pro-fascism is also anticapitalist

The opposite is true: fascist regimes worked hand-in-hand with big business. Many companies thrived under fascism, like IBM making the Holocaust more efficient, Mercedes-Benz used over 30,000 forced laborers in their factories, and major corporations like Ford, GM, and IG Farben made massive profits from Nazi war production. Rather than destroying capitalism, fascist "corporatism" actually destroyed labor unions while preserving private property and business profits. Fascist economic programs "favored the wealthy far more than the middle class and working class" — their anti-capitalist rhetoric was just propaganda to win support, not actual policy. The reality is that fascism represents capitalism's authoritarian mode during crisis, not its replacement.

And that’s not even the kind of critical analysis a socialist would put forward.

The third one is not the same account. Is it the same user? You tell me, you’re the mod.

So you actually managed to do moderation stuff and banned the fascist for a whole week, congratulations. I am indeed a bit surprised, gj!

How did that came to be? Because every time I pointed out their language, you ignored it, even called me unhinged for articulating a thorough critique. So you didn’t act on the user spewing hate speech, but on the user confronting you with your ignorant inaction. I don’t see how you’re fit for the job, lol.

Regarding the third example: instead of acting on the hate speech for which the user got their comment deleted (they openly fantasized about scenarios on how to kill a whole group of people), you used your energy to smudge the meaning of ableism in order to defend their post complaining about it. You’re still a shady and dishonest human being. And I am sorry, but that’s what I’m getting from your behaviour.

So, what brought you so far to actually ban a fascist for a week, what did he actually say? Because the instances I showed you obviously weren’t bad enough for you to act on it.

Which part is a false equivalence? I didn’t even take a side, just showing you your own bias. But I’ll fuck right off, alright, don’t need more ignorance in my life. Propagandist, lol, dude.

Obviously. Especially with their reporting on the Palestinian genocide or activism against it. So, so honest. Or the obvious western slant in like everything. Bombing sovereign countries is important and the right thing. Not informing about the extent of rising American facism. And of course, Russia bad, China bad.

There’s better reporting out there than either Western or Russian mainstream, which both are not there to inform you, but to build narrative. If not consumed carefully, they will make you dumber in their own respective ways.

So no, Western media is obviously not “obviously way more honest” and you believing and proclaiming that, while not your fault, is on you to inspect, Comrade.

You must understand that you are argueing with a (likely) paid western propagandist, eerily similar to accounts paid to do hasbara for Israel. 

While they claim, that you criticise the US, but let China (could be Russia, too) off the hook („do you also criticise China, like „do you condemn hamas“), they are the one initiating the China critique, while ignoring every ounce of responsibility of the worlds hegemon, the USA.

You won‘t get an honest or balanced or well informed take from @hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org, but only one of extreme western bias and smear against the west‘s current main adversaries, Russia and China.

It‘s all they do, that‘s the sole purpose of the account.

I was especially talking about blocking lemmy instances, but wasn‘t very clear on that. I‘m with you. Their conclusion was to block the goof‘s instance. By your logic then, they‘d have to stop consuming media period.

Yes yes, I wasn‘t very clear here. I didn‘t argue for RT, idgaf about them. I‘m talking about blocking lemmy instances, because of ideologic dissonances. GL, fellow goof.

Who are the other belligerents?