[-] dreamydreamer@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago

If you have a gun and at least some ammo and you also think you're likely to need to defend yourself with weapons then I think the gun's going to be better for so long as you can keep it operational, than a crossbow. Both need skill to use but I'd wager myself having a little more luck with the gun and it's probably going to be a lot more deadly and if you miss you have a little more opportunity to try again than you might with a crossbow. that's going to be awkward to try and reload in the heat of the moment, by yourself.

[-] dreamydreamer@lemmy.ml 14 points 12 hours ago

Touching and insightful stuff, the double reference to killing is a little messed up though, especially your friend that went as far as suggesting a place to bury the body that guy sends a chill down the spine.

24
submitted 13 hours ago by dreamydreamer@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Instinctively, I've often felt it might, but I wonder if that's how other people think.

Some context: I have worked in TV for a long time. I tried to become an editor, it was basically my dream to be a film or TV editor. This career didn't really work out. I had one or two credits to my name, but I couldn't convince my local industry to take me seriously and I never made that short list of people here who are regularly called to do this and no one really thinks of me as an editor. I ended up pigeonholed in to a technical role which I've spent most of my career since doing in order to make a living. It has been very depressing and disheartening to watch the dream wither.

Recently there was a bit of a seachange for me. I was unexpectedly plucked from my rut and put in to a colour grading role. I knew a bit about grading and had always liked it but was definitely not at that point someone I personally would have picked because of the lack of any credits in the role, and the lack of expert level proficiency normally required to do that for Television where speed, efficiency and accuracy are very important. As it happened, I loved it and I was able to rise to the occasion just fine and it's led to other credits since. I think I might finally have the career path that I actually like and feel some self-respect having.

However, the thing is I never truly gave up on being an editor, I just didn't really succeed as I'd like to have done and have begun following this colourist path basically because it just opened up in front of me. I recently completed colour for a series and it's been commissioned for a second series. I did well at that company and both myself and my work were well received. While there I vaguely raised the subject that I also edit and would love to do that for them if they needed it. I know for the second series they're likely to call me in for colour once more, and I know that they are doubling the number of episodes this time which would mean they will need more editors than last time around so while they'll definitely call in the old crew, maybe there's a chance they might be happy for me to do that as well as the colour. The thing is, if they don't themselves think of this and ask me about it, I wonder if mentioning it myself explicitly might backfire on me. I worry that if they turn out not to be interested in having me edit, the very act of mentioning it that second time, might lower their estimation of me as a colourist. I'm worried it might give off some air of arrogance, or possibly desperation, and maybe it'll look like I didn't really want to be a colourist or I'm not really interested in it which might sour them on hiring me for that role too.

Is this a valid concern? Is it poor form to try and snag additional roles when a company knows you for another? Would it make me look like a jack of all trades and master of none?

dreamydreamer

joined 7 months ago