To be fair, it's the newest rule change, so some older players may think it some new-fangled whipper snapper thing. We've only had about 150 years to get used to it.

The end game of chess is social alienation and alcoholism. The only winning move is not to play. Everything else is a blunder.

aborting everytime you are black

It's already happening to some extent (I think still a small extent). I'm reminded of this Ryan Long video making fun of people who follow wars on Twitter. I can say the people who he's making fun of are definitely real: I've met some of them. Their idea of figuring out a war or figuring out which side to support basically comes down to finding pictures of dead babies.

At 1:02 he specifically mentions people using AI for these images, which has definitely been cropping up here and there in Twitter discussions around Israel-Palestine.

I used to run a TFTP server on my router that held the decryption keys. As soon as a machine got far enough in the boot sequence to get network access, it would pull the decryption keys from the router. That way a thief would have to steal the router along with the computer, and have the router running when booting up the computer. It works wirelessly, too!

This is mostly how I operate, too. Keep it in FLAC so I always have something to go back to.

But if I ever need a USB stick to play in the car, I'm just going MP3 and not thinking twice about it. I know every car that plays from USB is going to play MP3 just fine.

You're not wrong, but there's a kind of irony in it when you talk about ending humanity because of it. There's a lot to hate about humanity if you have humanity and have human values. There's nothing objectively wrong about being cruel or destructive or dishonest or greedy or abusive or murderous and I imagine most hypothetical alien species would look at those things and say "what's wrong with any of that?"

But because humans evolved as social creatures and our survival depended upon trusting one another, we're constantly trying to judge ourselves against values that can't actually be met. So we look at ourselves and say we're a really horrible species, but that statement only makes sense because ironically we're a really glorious species that's fabricated these completely irrational things like love and compassion and empathy and honesty and sacrifice that no other species has (though many other social species do have bits and pieces of them).

And we'll forever hate ourselves for not being able to live up to our own values.

Cancer and clean-shavenness aside, I disagree with much of his talk. I don't see making social media (or "anti-social media" as he calls it) illegal is the best solution.

Digg, ... don’t fail in a day

It depends on precisely what you mean by "fail" and how strictly you take "day", but Digg did lose 50% of its traffic within 30 days (and it never recovered).

Yeah I think people are always going to be seeking out something that's real, even if it's just to hate. (Celebrity culture has taught me that people love to hate other people). Well, of course, you can have an AI-generated person be controversial and racist, too, if that's what people want.

I suspect there's going to be an arms race around generating/detecting what is real.

We'll have social media celebrities which pretend to be real but are actually AI-generated. This will give Internet detectives plenty of material to work with to say "their hand looks a little weird in this one photo" or "notice how they've never posted a video? hmm suspicious" and expose them as being AI-generated. Then AI will get a bit better, and their hand won't look weird in that one photo any more, and they will be in (short, to start with) videos, and the Twitter sleuths will have to work even harder. (But they will never admit to themselves that they actually like the detective work involved in exposing/cancelling people). And the arms race in the social media sphere will escalate.

And then on the Hollywood side, dead celebrities and non-existent people will start making cameos and bit parts, as extras and things. And that will generate some controversy and hate, but people will watch it anyway. And studios will push harder and harder to make bigger and bigger roles for AI actors, seeing how much controversy things will generate, testing the waters, and seeing how many of us will watch it anyway. Maybe at first there will be a lot of mocap and other stuff to help the audience still feel like it's "real", but as the envelope is pushed, we will get more forgiving in what we expect to be "real".

Anyway, I think there will be a chase after people who are real, but I suspect eventually it'll just get too tiring or too difficult for most of us to find real celebrities.

We will see!

Traditionally it's been a day for young people to go out partying and clubbing in costumes.

But last year 67 people were crushed to death and we had an official week-long period of mourning. We will see how Halloween is treated this year.

Yeah it's not the end of the world. It's slightly disappointing that you have to create yet another account unnecessarily.