[-] ebikefolder@feddit.de 1 points 7 months ago

Good. We need a steady reduction of the economic volume.

[-] ebikefolder@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago

Our first colour tv cost about 3 months of my dad's salary in the early 1970s. And the Siemens mainframe computer in the company he worked for was tens of thousands (which was more than a year's worth of the average salary). Rent. Every month. It had less computing power than my smartphone.

[-] ebikefolder@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Energy_statistics_-_latest_trends_from_monthly_data#Gas_consumption

Looking at monthly data from January 2022 to December 2022 (Figure 11), with the exception of March and April, consumption has been consistently below the 2017-2022 average of the respective months of those years. Between January and July 2022, natural gas consumption in the EU varied between 1 938 Petajoules (PJ) in January and 785 PJ in July, indicating a monthly decrease overall, even before the target of 15% gas reduction was set up

While the gas reserves are higher than ever (https://www.consilium.europa.eu/de/infographics/gas-storage-capacity/)

Absolutely no reason to worry about supply, cold homes, or lights going out.

[-] ebikefolder@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I have been reading what you wrote, but I don't consider your "renewables can't" a valid point. They can.

But I don't think we will ever be able to convince each other. Can we agree on that?

[-] ebikefolder@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

You can't just ignore the cost. Why spend €100 on nuclear, when you can generate 3 times as much electricity using wind, with the same amount?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levelized_cost_of_electricity

[-] ebikefolder@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

France regularly imports (renewable) electricity from Germany when they have to shut down some of their reactors due to cooling problems in summer. So 50 are not enough. For a smaller economy.

[-] ebikefolder@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

don’t you think we should be exploring every carbon free avenue, and shutting down every single fossil fuel power plant?

Sure. But nuclear is probably not the answer: we don't have those decades left it takes to build hundreds of new plants. Not to mention the astronomical cost. The ship had sailed 30 years ago.

Edit: the last 3 nuclear plants we shut down this year had a combined capacity of around 4 GW. In 2022 we installed over 7 GW of solar and about 2.5 GW of wind capacity (this year it will probably significantly more)

[-] ebikefolder@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Your first link is almost one year old. They did indeed prepare for a worst case, which didn't occur after all. Coal and gas consumption (total, not just percentage wise) did not go up, but down instead.

Yes, a mild winter helped. Unfortunately, winters are getting warmer and warmer, and the last one was no exception there.

[-] ebikefolder@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

https://strom-report.com/strom/

The amount of electricity generated from fossil and conventional energy sources fell by 12.2% in the first half of 2023 compared to the same period of the previous year. The largest decline, at 22%, was measured in power generation from coal. Coal-fired power plants fed in a total of 17.3 billion kWh less than in the previous year. Nuclear power generation has also declined due to the shutdown of the last 3 nuclear power plants. Nuclear power plants still fed 6.7 billion kWh of electricity into the grid in the first half of 2023 and thus contributed 3% to the electricity mix. Electricity generation from natural gas fell by 4.1% compared to the same period last year

Kind of says the opposite, doesn't it?

[-] ebikefolder@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

So why are we still using fossil fuels then?

You already gave the answer: Because they should have started sooner.

[-] ebikefolder@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

My basics:

  • second hand almost everything
  • some stuff from my balcony (chives, chard, strawberries, rosemary)
  • sewing machine to alter and mend my (second hand) clothes or linens, and to make stuff from scraps (like pillowcases, handkerchiefs or potholders)
  • "ugly" vegetables (not pretty enough for supermarket shelves)
  • cloth napkins, rugs and handkerchiefs
  • almost no meat
  • only tap water to drink (well, ok, coffee in the morning and herbal tea in the evening)
  • no car, but a public transport pass and two bicycles

Jarring: Not much of a learning curve, and you hardly need any equipment. I do have jars anyway for shopping at the zero waste shop, and you can simply use your oven. But still I hardly ever do it.

I rent, so could only install a small solar system on my balcony. Not high on my priority list - but I have some shares in local solar and windpower co-ops. Electricity is expensive (Germany), but is covered that way

Minimalism: I prefer a minimalistic look, but I think if you save money, you are a minimalist even if it doesn't show.

I do have a bread maker and wouldn't want to miss it.

I only wear natural fibres, so of course cotton (or wool!) socks and underwear. But those are the only clothes I buy new so I can easily afford the best quality there. I darn my socks, by the way.

Drugs: I don't drink any alcohol but I vape, and treat myself to a good Cuban cigar every once in a while.

[-] ebikefolder@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

In Europe it's required by law for most items. And it's the only price I look at when I buy stuff.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

ebikefolder

joined 1 year ago