Let's apply the same standard, then.
Let it ride until after the election, and then apologize and correct the mistake.
Let's apply the same standard, then.
Let it ride until after the election, and then apologize and correct the mistake.
The answer to, "How do I delete someone else's comment?" turned out to be, "$44 billion."
Altruism is never going to be the way to get companies to do the right thing. Instead, making the wrong thing a financial liability is.
Fyi, the US president cannot set prices for these things.
That said, he's trying, using what power he does have.
It's the same crisis from the last election.
Remember the migrant caravans that evaporated on November 3? Same thing.
Yes.
It's deprecating old phone OS versions.
It's hardly new territory.
Man, after the EEOC ruling, it was obvious this, or something like it, would appear.
And frankly, on the pure merits, this chucklefuck is right: selecting businesses based on their owners' skin color is discrimination based on race.
But like colleges will surely find a slightly different metric to give preference to BIPOC and other disadvantaged groups, lenders that want to lend to businesses owned by BIPOC individuals will do the same. Perhaps, in this case, instead of "Is the person black?" they can ask, off the top of my head, "Will lending or investing in this business help overcome systemic racism or help lift traditionally oppressed populations out of poverty?"
Meanwhile, Justice Thomas will get a new boat and vote accordingly.
The other half does this infuriating thing where they spend the first 20 minutes looking up all the actors on IMDB and then ask what's going on.
The thing I miss about Reddit most is RES -- I want to be able to tag these users before I block them outright.
For what it's worth, a lot of countries with decent privacy laws are looking at closing that stupid loophole by requiring "affirmative consent" whenever something changes to the detriment of the consumer (i.e., more data, wider scope, etc.), meaning the companies would have to require the user to take some action to affirm they consent.
Those same proposals also have provisions prohibiting account suspension / blocking for not consenting. I.e., you can say "no" and continue to use the service exactly as before, though, newer features may be blocked.
Technically,
The president and vice president are chosen by the electoral college in separate votes.
Though, for some time, it's always been the winning candidate's selected running mate... there is no requirement there. The electors could pick Mittens the back flipping poodle for VP if they wanted.