[-] fxdave@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

There's hope. Thanks for letting me know.

[-] fxdave@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Now instead of having Wayland covering everything, applications try to cover every desktops. In the good old times, it worked everywhere.

Why does flameshot need to handle different wayland desktops separately? Because simply the protocol doesn't do it's job. It doesn't cover everything. It's indeed not ready.

[-] fxdave@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
***
that might potentially sell
+++ that is pushed with money
[-] fxdave@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

If they want to fight hard, they just add the ads into the stream.

[-] fxdave@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

I liked this discussion. However, I think both of you have different axioms. It's a pro-socialism vs pro-capitalism debate.

In capitalism, we need innovation to create new value. Or you can pollute water to sell water bottles which will have value now. It's up to citizens to decide what to restrict that was publicly available or what to innovate.

In socialism, the innovation is only happening where it needs to happen carefully planned and funded by the government.

I'm rather socialist, so I'd defend it:

Having a software with inability to modify is injustice, It's the same as polluting a water to sell it. Even if we need to pollute the water to sell it, it doesn't justify pollution.

[-] fxdave@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

yeah I'm a fucking idiot because I thought wrongly the redis' language...

[-] fxdave@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Our views can be compatible. Endless os is quite limited right now, but if flathub would have xampp, for example, that would be easily the simplest way to run a webserver. However, every techy person prefers docker, me too. It's just not something that my mother can deal with. In general, linux is lacking these mother compatible apps where we have more advanced solution. Of course, I wouldn't recommend endless and others in the category if the goal is to run a webserver.

[-] fxdave@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago
[-] fxdave@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

there won't be two pointers, but multiple devices are supported

[-] fxdave@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

I would imagine it as lemmy. It would be a free, ethical software which is indirectly funded by the government. Everybody uses facebook so that's a good reason to turn it into a public property. We could make it without anti-features. Made for people, not for profit.

[-] fxdave@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Once someone asked if somebody knows how to run this old game in a linux community.

The game was "capitalism lab". I said no, we are communists.

The guy then deleted his post.

[-] fxdave@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I wish it would be possible now but it probably won't happen until windows and mac will have similar features. The problem is that processes cannot just read a file, because in the container it doesn't exist. It's maybe due to permission. Maybe not. You cannot tell. Android apps are written in a way that they request access, while pc apps are just reading the files directly without requesting permission.

So the app has to be written for flatpak. However, afaik, this is the maintainers goal too. Btw, the file open dialog is a currently working example of the dynamic permission handling. It's just that the app should use these features which is not guaranteed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

fxdave

joined 2 years ago