[-] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

Scholz needs to be handed over to the Palestinians to answer for his crimes.

[-] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago

Where does it say that? How would this be enforced?

[-] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 months ago

Are you sure it's not a 686? Because apparently the Pentium Pro from 1995 is already a 686, by 2001 the Pentium 4 was already out.

[-] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

Ich sag nicht die diplomatischen Beziehungen kappen, sondern die diplomatische Unterstützung einstellen. Deutschland gibt Israel bei der UN und international Rückendeckung.

[-] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago
  1. It is not illegal to assinate terrorists.
  2. It is not illegal to dress as a doctor or nurse.
  3. There is no occupation, only conquered territory. The lands were lost when the Arabs invaded Israel and lost. Israel should incorporate non-citizen Arabs into Israel and I believe it will eventually happen.

Wow.

[-] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago

This doesn't make sense. People are going to forget about this incident in a couple of days, and nothing will change. Why would Russia sacrifice their plane for a couple of days of bad PR for Ukraine?

Someone fucked up and did not tell the air defense crew to hold their fire, most likely. Ukraine says it was the Russians that forgot to tell them. Maybe? You'd think the details of this prisoner exchange would have been hashed out days before in detail, so I'm thinking it more likely someone on Ukraine's side forgot hand down this info to the AD crew. But who knows, it's gonna be he said, she said.

The fact that Ukraine is already is floating conspiracy theories makes me think they're full of shit.

[-] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago

It's exactly what I thought it would be: they don't want to die.

They're sending new conscripts directly to the front with no or almost no training. That's a death sentence. No sane person would want to go there.

[-] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 months ago

Attempting complete eradication is not necessary under UN definition, and in Srebrenica, 8000 people, far from all Bosnians, and not even the majority of people in Srebrenica, were killed, and that's still an official court-approved genocide. The convention says "in whole or in part", after all.

This is not negligence. This is obviously willful intent. They're starving two million people. They know what the result of that is. They repeatedly bomb civilians. And they know they're killing civilians. They know they're not bombing military targets. They do this over and over. Repeatedly doing genocidal acts implies genocidal intent, you don't have to go off of rhetoric.

The government of Israel are not liberal Zionists, so I don't know why you bring that up even. It's not genocide because not everyone in Israel wants genocide, just the far-right and the far-right government? What argument is that? That's pretzel-brain speaking.

Also, most Israelis know what's going on. Anyone who still supports this now after what has been going for over three months, while arguing self-defense, is either lying or completely delusional. Maybe they don't like to think of themselves as genocidal maniacs, but they're still supporting genocide and coming up with excuses why it's okay this time. Liberal Zionists that don't want this to stop immediately are still complicit. And again, that's irrelevant when the far-right is in power. That's still Israel, as a state, doing this and guilty of genocide.

[-] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

"They can't do that! You can't negotiate with Hitler, remember? That's appeasement!"

"Who are they to tell Ukraine anything! It's a sovereign country! By telling them to negotiate they're basically helping Putin! Fuck those pro-Russian traitors!"

"Ukraine's negotiation position is weak now, they will be in a much better position after the upcoming spring offensive!"

[-] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

I don't think I can go any more official than the OHCHR, and I don't think I can convince you of your good vs evil narrative with any source. People got shelled, it's obviously implied they got shelled by the other side, and no theory to the contrary is put forward in the report.

I'll let you ponder this: This would be the first conflict in which one side commits all the war crimes. Even more curious, the side which commits no war crimes has a bunch of volunteer units literally using Nazi, SS and Bandera iconography. You know, the guys that marched hundreds of thousands of civilians into the woods and murdered them. Does that seem plausible to you?

[-] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes it says that exactly, unless you think the "armed groups" shelled themselves.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

gnuhaut

joined 1 year ago