It’s completely irrelevant who made the point. If you can “agree” or “disagree” with the content, by principle it does not belong in YSK.
Take a look at some of the posts in this community. Does it seem like you could agree or disagree with most of them? No, because the typical YSK post is just a plain piece of information, which is either true or false (hopefully true).
But that’s not the main point you’re making. “YSK: upvoting content makes it more visible” wouldn’t be much of a post would it?
You’re trying by to dictate what people “should” or “shouldn’t” promote. That part isn’t objective, it’s conveying your own ideas. Which doesn’t fit the YSK community.
YSK: this community is mainly for facts or guides. What you’ve posted is an opinion.
I think it has potential to get there eventually. It already follows the similar design and usage philosophies, and I imagine the development could really take off now.
Keep in mind that Apollo has years of full-time development behind it, whereas Mlem is essentially an early beta of an open-source passion project.
This sounds like something a robot pretending to be a human acting as a robot convincing you it’s human in an ironic, humorous way would say!
Think about it. Under each level of irony, there could always be another level of robot. (That includes me right now.)
The singularity isn’t “near” as people say, we’re already way past it. (In text-based communication anyway.)