[-] jray4559@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Honestly, this kind of thing should be done automatically by whatever app they sign up with. It's not something that the average person will really know how to choose.

Because it's not only number of users, it's also number of connections to other servers, how many federate with it. Most people don't wanna use a social network where they have to type exactly what they want in to search it every time. Never mind the different policies about posting and de-federation that can completely change how the network works for each user.

It's the disadvantage of decentralizion, and we've gotta band-aid it somehow.

[-] jray4559@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Centralization. Meta will develop the fediverse protocol up with their own specific enhancements, locking most of us onto their version of the platform due to convenience given enough time. (Think RCS as an example, it's technically an open standard but Google has effective control of it thanks to special features)

You might say "Well, if they are a better platform, so what, why not go there", but the problem is that they can cut off the rest of the fediverse as "outdated" essentially privatizing everybody.

[-] jray4559@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, yes, I was waiting for the Taliban to tell me which one of these two online clusterfucks to start using.

I'm surprised they even care about Twitter, wouldn't they want to be underground?

[-] jray4559@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Good. Hell, once the user-instance blocking thing comes out, give people a list and instructions to block those political instances, porn ones, etc. etc. I always like it to be on the user level, rather than some over-arching force telling me what I can and can't view. Freedom to make the decision for yourself should be a large priority.

[-] jray4559@lemmy.fmhy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

I would have preferred to have a no-defederation policy (except for maybe threads due to EEE fears), but as long as it is not swung around constantly, I am okay with it.

The two that are blocked are political circlejerks that I personally dislike anyways. I am hopeful there is not more.

[-] jray4559@lemmy.fmhy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Because an ad or a subscription is more obvious.

Algorithms are harder to prove and don't interrupt the flow of content, thus less people get pissed, which means less people leave, and they can charge higher rates to advertisers.

[-] jray4559@lemmy.fmhy.ml 69 points 1 year ago

Honestly, this is "danger to the people" territory. He needs to be deposed.

[-] jray4559@lemmy.fmhy.ml 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Man this year has just been a total collapse of everything:

character,ai filtrations

GPT slowly being neutered thanks to societal concerns

Twitter being fucked by Mr. Elon "I know everything" Musk

Imgur cleaning house for no reason

Reddit dropping a nuke on 3rd Party apps

Netflix killing password sharing

Youtube feeling in to kill adblockers

-and now gfycat is about to collapse entirely.

What the actual fuck?

[-] jray4559@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Doubtful, to be honest.

Most who have used 3rd Party apps have already migrated or found some other solution. Those who don't care are still using the official app, and, to be frank, despite what everyone says, the quality content hasn't decreased by that much.

It's still half Twitter and TikTok reposts, and one-fourth 'advice subs' (creative writing), like it's been for several years before this debacle.

Hell, maybe this is a good thing in some ways, where that kind of content can hopefully fall by the wayside over here, instead of choking communities out like it does in Reddit. (I have over 50 popular subreddits on Boost filtered out to avoid this stuff, and it's still not enough to get rid of all of it)

jray4559

joined 1 year ago