*ne pas avoir
Must to what?
How about this one?:
My guess is it's the tone/phrasing of the comment. They could've just said he has about 10 million bucks. Which imo is not an exorbitant amount of wealth to have accumulated for a (very...) senior citizen who has worked for >50 years in upper echelon functions.
The blanket statement about readers 'not being fine' because they don't have that kind of money also doesn't help.
Except that the download numbers don't correspond at all with the population numbers.
Reminds me of Stephen Colbert and Hugh Laurie pointing out the sheer ridiculousness of censoring words:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x12t3st
Solid advice, right up there with the one about yellow snow.
Wonder if they ever addressed the risk of cross-contamination with the Germ warfare repository next-door
If the US is stupid enough to elect this idiot a second time, then we deserve to become the banana republic ...
"A banana republic, if you can keep it"
John Oliver was doing something like that around a piece about data brokers:
https://youtu.be/wqn3gR1WTcA?si=rq-rJmo4YoW5vt6b&t=20m55s
It was wonderful.
If you refuse they simply don't sell you the car.
Sure, question is of course: will they be able to do something about it if you agree to the terms and sell it anyway. I don't think 'breaking' an agreement based on unlawful stipulations is actionable (ianal)
jwt
joined 2 years ago
And if the inevitable happens, does it need to give consent?