[-] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

I'm afraid if you're behind CGNAT it won't work. Your router should have unique public IP. I'm not too well versed though..

[-] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

As someone who just learned about Caddy, could you elaborate?

[-] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago
[-] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago
[-] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

I agree 100%, I've had similiar rants :D

[-] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

The soundchip on that thing was awesome <3

[-] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I am fixating on the thing that relates to this picture. It seems to me (honestly, I don't mean to come off as an ass) that your 2nd point of discussion is very much my "muddying the water" point. I don't want to discuss that point, as that was totally irrelevant here. If I understood correctly, your 2 points were: (I'm paraphrasing, but) "I don't understand, why showroom owners should let homeless people sleep inside their premises" and "every other economic system besides capitalism also has these qualities"

Right? And I think I have provided arguments against both of these. What am I missing?

[-] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

The part where you did actually muddy the waters is that you assumed that the picture depicts problems in a "showroom - homeless person" context, which is clearly not the case (as you contradictingly say yourself and even recognize when you said: "when “capitalism” is written on the photo"). The picture clearly criticizes capitalism as a economic system, but you wanted to make the showroom the focus point of the photo. That is muddying the waters. You dismiss the original critique. Or at least that's how I read your comment. The difference between "I was talking about multiple points" and "muddying the waters" is not that big.

On the other part, yeah, fair enough. I would compare it to a "utopian socialist society" rather than communistic, but sure whatever. I mean there are countries in the world where taking this picture is very easy, and some (socialist) countries where it's take a bit of effort to find a situation like this to photograph in the first place (most nordic european countries, for example).

The whole point of the image we are both commenting is a critique on capitalism. You are moving the point slightly towards "critique on showroom owners".

However let's not get sidetracked here. In a utopian society there would be showrooms, yes. But the person would not be forced to sleep outside without a bed in such a society, be there showrooms or not. That is the point. Capitalism allows this, a socialist society doesn't (just look at the countries with least homeless people and you'll see)

[-] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah I mean they should include a lot more info: OS (version/build) and FF version/build at least.

Also is nobody saying that of course the second video renders faster because he hits reload and most of the stuff comes from cache? D:

[-] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Peace and quiet" is very well put.

[-] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just got the popup a couple of times but never any ads. I'm behind Pi-hole, running Firefox with arkenfox.js and uBlock

[-] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

If they integrate Lemmy, then I'm in!

view more: ‹ prev next ›

kadotux

joined 2 years ago