[-] lauha@lemmy.one 9 points 1 month ago

One could argue, that joints are part of the skeleton.

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"inconsequential"

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

CAN YOU EAR ME NOW??

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 9 points 2 months ago

They could have all of that if they gave up even one billionaire. And nothing of value would be lost.

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 9 points 4 months ago

That question was not a question but more like a "Lol, world's second greatest navy lost to a country with no navy, lmao"

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 9 points 4 months ago

I wouldn't tell anyone if I found a socket vein either. Big Electric is hoarding all mines

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 9 points 7 months ago

Did you mean "Disengage safety protocols", because safeties are on my default

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 9 points 7 months ago

You answered it yourself. "Vague incidents"

Anyone can write a vague description of an incident and then in hindsight cherry pick any incident that matches it and claim fulfillment.

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 9 points 8 months ago

Combined with the 1-inch sensor, who even needs a compact camera, anymore?

I don't think people have used compact cameras for past 15 years now, apart from niche uses.

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 9 points 8 months ago

What? You use sandpaper for sanding and saw for sawing??

Are you trying to ruin hammer industry? Back in the day radicals like you would have been burned on a stake.

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 9 points 11 months ago

We don't have enough apes in northern europe

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 9 points 11 months ago

OP specified that it's hypothetical and you can choose to ignore the consequences if you choose.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

lauha

joined 1 year ago