I don't disagree with you that Mozilla are not exactly on the ball, all I'm saying is that Brave comparing their privacy hardened fork of Chrome with a non privacy hardened mainline browser is, at best, disingenuous.
"With a government like this, who needs terrorists?"
[micdrop]
I'll see your Star Trek and raise you The Culture.
Is your British half about 500 years old?
Yep, could well be. I ain't knocking Mullvad at all .
That is true, no disagreement here. That's the truly scary thing about the man - he clearly does represent a lot of people.
But right now, he is the immediate danger.
I understand that. Neither option is 'good'. But one of the options will (in my opinion) have a bloody good go at removing your ability to have the option at all in the future.
I love how American journalists decide to demonise an industry by putting the word 'Big' in front of it.
It's now a better search engine in that VPN users don't get thrown off after two searches anymore. But the fact that it's owned by a data harvesting company means it's a risk to use.
Lots of people mentioning Kagi. Sorry, but any engine that needs an account to work is not for me. They say you can pay anonymously, but none of their payment methods are anonymous. And $10 per month for unlimited searches?
Fucking well done Ohio.
It is still in there.
Nobody has to ask anyone out, its not compulsory. Women do ask potential dates out, so do men. Its pretty irrelevant who the one doing the asking is - the point is not to put the onus on one gender but that if you - whoever you are - don't ask, then you'll never know.