[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

The risk is the whole point, and certainly does not excuse their gouging.

The risk is the point though. High risk activities will cost more to insure because they'll need to be paid out more often. Couple that with the high destruction possible, and you have frequent accidents that can all cause very expensive damage, necessitating a high base price for insurance.

The price gouging is just capitalism, and I doubt anyone here is going to argue that capitalism isn't bad.

[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

"Google" is just the generic term for a web search, kind of like how velcro means all hook-and-loop fasteners and xerox is a (photo)copy

[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Is getting a news story all that matters for an "effective" protest? If so, you must think blocking traffic is an incredibly effective protest strategy.

[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Protesters accuse Raytheon of abuses, block plant entrances

It's amazing how protesters already tried that and nothing happened.

18 people facing charges for allegedly defacing Raytheon sign during protest in Tewksbury

Somehow, the "effective" protests you recommend don't seem to be doing anything. Do you have any other bright ideas? Maybe something that the average person will actually learn about?

[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Organic Maps (the app) lets you download maps of various areas ahead of time

[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

According to wikipedia, right now he's tied with 6 others for first.

[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

So "imperialism" is a Chinese code word? You can't imagine anyone else talking or thinking about imperialism without them working for the Chinese government?

You will never listen to any arguments, because your masters won’t allow it.

What arguments? You saw "imperialism" and immediately shut down, refusing to engage or say anything of substance.

We’re past where facts matter.

You're certainly not helping.

[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

And yet we trust almost all of them to operate a 2-ton machine on a daily basis here in the US.

[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Addiction Disorders: The relationship between addiction and homelessness is complex and controversial. While rates of alcohol and drug abuse are disproportionately high among the homeless population, the increase in homelessness over the past two decades cannot be explained by addiction alone. Many people who are addicted to alcohol and drugs never become homeless, but people who are poor and addicted are clearly at increased risk of homelessness. Addiction does increase the risk of displacement for the precariously housed; in the absence of appropriate treatment, it may doom one's chances of getting housing once on the streets. Homeless people often face insurmountable barriers to obtaining health care, including addictive disorder treatment services and recovery supports. Source

It is believed that only about 20 to 40 percent of homeless have a substance abuse issue. In fact, abuse is rarely the sole cause of homelessness and more often is a response to it because living on the street puts the person in frequent contact with users and dealers.

The prevalence of mental illness and substance use among those experiencing homelessness is clear, but Kushel cautions that the vast majority of mental illness among the study participants is anxiety and depression. It’s likely the lack of resources exacerbates those conditions, rather than the illness causing the homelessness, she says.

“I think that the driving issue is clearly the deep poverty, that the median [monthly] household income for everyone in the household in the six months before homelessness was $960, in a state with the highest housing costs in the country,” she says. Other studies have noted that the end of pandemic stimulus payments and rising inflation has led to rents outpacing wages. The study notes that in 2023, California had only 24 units of affordable housing available for every 100 extremely low-income households.Source

Just because you know one or two people that were homeless and also had problems with addiction, doesn't mean the addiction caused their homelessness.

[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

It hasn't happened yet, so we don't know the exact legal justification for why it should or shouldn't be allowed. This is a lawsuit to remove Trump's name from the ballots.

  1. Courts have disqualified officials under the Fourteenth Amendment who played far less substantial roles in insurrections, and who, like Trump, did not personally commit violent acts. This includes Couy Griffin, a former New Mexico county commissioner who was a grassroots mobilizer, inciter, and member of Trump’s mob on January 6th (but did not commit violent acts or breach the Capitol building), and Kenneth Worthy, who served as a sheriff in a Confederate state (but did not take up arms in the Confederate army).^7^ If these individuals’ conduct warranted Section 3 disqualification, then surely Trump’s does as well.
  1. Since January 6, 2021, Trump has publicly affirmed his disloyalty to the Constitution and his allegiance to the insurrectionists who seized the Capitol for him. He has called the insurrectionists “patriots,”^8^ vowed to give many “full pardons with an apology” if he becomes President again,9 financially supported them,^10^ released a song with a choir of convicted January 6th defendants called “Justice for All,”^11^ and hugged on camera a convicted January 6th defendant who has said that Pence and Members of Congress who voted to certify Biden’s victory should be executed for treason.^12^

Without going through the whole legal document, there seems to be a fairly good reason for why Trump shouldn't be allowed to run for president, and removing his name from the primary elections would be one step towards that.

[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

One of my neighbours has kids who love to play on a go-kart and wake me up at 6am on a Saturday morning

As long as it’s not ... extremely obnoxious (playing extremely loud music and refusing to turn it down)

I'm not sure I see a meaningful difference here. And why is it you don't see polluting the air to be a direct health risk? If you wanted to ride a bike or walk instead of drive everywhere, I'm sure you'd see how car exhaust doesn't just disappear immediately.

[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

The wealthiest 10% owns 90% of all stocks. And realistically, how many people can actually track the supply chain of every product they buy to try to only buy from ethical companies? How many truly plastic free options even are there for basic things like bread, toothbrushes/toothpaste, or soap?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

ltxrtquq

joined 2 years ago