[-] mark@programming.dev 1 points 21 minutes ago

Wow what a great community idea! As more product reviews are added, it would make Lemmy more indexable to search engines as well.

[-] mark@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You can reply and interact on platforms from an RSS reader. All an RSS feed is is a list of links. When you click them, you go directly to the platform. When using on a mobile device, RSS readers will even open the app for you to reply or interact with posts.

The fediverse will never replace RSS feeds. They serve a totally different purpose.

[-] mark@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That sort of aggregating would make more sense in an RSS reader. RSS feeds are exactly for that purpose.

But a platform trying to interop from an infinite number of unrelated platforms just seems odd.

[-] mark@programming.dev 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Don't think this opinion is unpopular at all. It makes sense for platforms that are similar to interop.

Hypothetically like Youtube interop with Peertube (video platforms) or Instagram interop with Pixelfed (photos). Or Threads, Reddit and Lemmy (forums). And Mastodon and Twitter (sorry, but just making a point here 😁)

But yeah, see no reason for interop between platforms with completely different purposes.

22
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by mark@programming.dev to c/privacy@lemmy.world

And it applies across your entire SL account. Seems very easy to hit, given that people use SL to curb influxes of inbound email spam.

If you go over the limit, they start throttling your emails (delivering them late).

[-] mark@programming.dev 64 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I dont want any parts of Threads. But if they're gonna federate, at least do it 100%. This half-ass, piecemeal approach where they release an itty bitty teeny weeny change every month is weird.

[-] mark@programming.dev 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

As an engineer who's worked on very large codebases over two decades, I've realized that this is so much easier said then done.

If people want to fork Mastodon, great. But they'll quickly realize that what they may think are straight-forward "improvements" will lead to them having to address bigger architectural issues.

Many design decisions that were made when building Mastodon may not be perfect, but they address a lot of very complex decentralization and federation issues.

There's no such thing as perfect software. What some may think is an improvement, others will think is a terrible choice. Each decision is a trade-off and will have downsides. We just have to decide which of them we're comfortable with living with.

[-] mark@programming.dev 41 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Not condoning it, but all I can think is how terrible Facebook is for "coordinating" stuff like this. I mean, if FB or the feds wanted to find out who these people are, track them down or something, they can do that pretty easily. People who do stuff like this aren't too bright, though. So not surprised, I guess.

[-] mark@programming.dev 48 points 4 months ago

These were great in their day, but it’s time to move on to something better and safer.

How is it "safer" when contributing to the codebase or filing and discussing issues will now require creating an account and giving up personal information to one of the most privacy-invasive tech companies in the world? 😳

[-] mark@programming.dev 150 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Google says pause ads on YouTube are getting a very positive reaction from advertisers

Bc screw the users and their reactions 😄.

We really need a good YouTube competitor. This is beyond ridiculous at this point.

16
Say Goodbye to Contact Form Spam (omrilotan.medium.com)

Came across this interesting article. But what do you all think?

319

HUGE win for EU and for Developers with apps in Apple's App store! 🚀

[-] mark@programming.dev 48 points 9 months ago

Yup. And instead, they make us pay them for it. 🤡

554
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by mark@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

This makes me 😭

UPDATE: Thanks @nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de for this update: The issue has now been commented on and was closed by the maintainer, where they explained why those blocks would be nonsense. But it appears the OP wants to still talk with maintainer privately about it.

144
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by mark@programming.dev to c/linux@programming.dev

I personally wouldn't touch Discord with a 10 foot pole but figured any privacy-focused people who use it may want to know this.

[-] mark@programming.dev 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is 👍. For those wondering, RFCs have been around for years in software engineering--since the beginning of the internet, practically.

As a software engineer myself, I can confidently say they're a great way to build complex software in a more democratic way.

They require a certain level of agreement and consensus, which makes them take a while to ratify. But you almost always end up with better software in the end.

[-] mark@programming.dev 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Take that, Stack Overflow! Programming.dev on deck!!!! Let's gooooooo

56
submitted 1 year ago by mark@programming.dev to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

I'm a dev and I was browsing Mozilla's careers page and came across this. I find a privacy respecting company being interested in building an AI powered recommendation engine a little odd. Wouldn't they need to sift through the very data we want private in order for a recommendation engine to be good? Curious of what others think.

view more: next ›

mark

joined 1 year ago