[-] maxmalrichtig@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 3 months ago

Brother, really? Have you even seen one before? 🤔

[-] maxmalrichtig@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 months ago

Things get really unintuitive when you go near the speed of light. Einstein's "Special Relativity" is describing that. Watch a couple of videos on the topic. It's mindbending but seriously cool.

In short: The speed light is always constant FOR EVERY OBSERVER. That means, if you would hold a flashlight in a very fast moving train, the light would travel as the same speed for you as for a stationary person that is watching your flashlight from outside the train.

But how could that be? Aren't you "adding" the trains speed to your flashlight? So shouldn't the light in your train travel faster in your train? Or maybe slower? No. Light speed is always constant - but what is NOT constant is space and time. It is relative to the observer. Time and space can stretch/dilate to make up for what seems to be a paradox. E.g. your trains would shrink in length the faster you go. But it would look different to you than it does to an outside observer.

As I said, it's mindbending, but there are a couple of cool and simple videos on the internet to get a better grasp on the matter.

[-] maxmalrichtig@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 months ago

I'm really sorry for that. But please don't be mad at me - I'd rather not have beef with anyone.

[-] maxmalrichtig@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 4 months ago

OP was asking?! 🤷

If you just want to mock me, think of something more original... I mean, come on. You call that a "joke"?

[-] maxmalrichtig@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 9 months ago

Wait, you're supposed to adapt? I just fumble my way through the day.

Is it weird

No. You're fine.

[-] maxmalrichtig@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 years ago

Emacs. But honestly, I have no idea what I am doing.

[-] maxmalrichtig@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This would incentivise instances to keep growing, as more users would potentially mean more income. I don't think that this is a good idea as it conflicts the decentralized nature of the fediverse.

I would suggest that we promote donations more. Seriously, nobody is talking about that stuff.

Furthermore, "money" doesn't always fix a communities infrastructure issues - people do. Most of the time, admins are a one-person-army. If people would take over work (like moderation, implementing helpful features in code, ...) more often, that might help out the admins more than just throwing money at them.

It is the same as with a lot of open source communities: It's not all about the money, it's about people getting active and involved and helping each other out.

[-] maxmalrichtig@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 years ago

That is kind an off logic. Sounds more like an excuse for not taking action than anything else. I bet you can dismantle your arguments on your own in no time of you try.

[-] maxmalrichtig@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 years ago

I would vote for more efficient means by removing highly inefficient food "production" - aka meat. That would free up a lot of potential. Vertical farming can probably be used sustainably in some cases but I feel it should not be used on a bigger scale.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

maxmalrichtig

joined 2 years ago