OP was asking?! 🤷
If you just want to mock me, think of something more original... I mean, come on. You call that a "joke"?
OP was asking?! 🤷
If you just want to mock me, think of something more original... I mean, come on. You call that a "joke"?
Wait, you're supposed to adapt? I just fumble my way through the day.
Is it weird
No. You're fine.
Emacs. But honestly, I have no idea what I am doing.
A bisschen Senf
This would incentivise instances to keep growing, as more users would potentially mean more income. I don't think that this is a good idea as it conflicts the decentralized nature of the fediverse.
I would suggest that we promote donations more. Seriously, nobody is talking about that stuff.
Furthermore, "money" doesn't always fix a communities infrastructure issues - people do. Most of the time, admins are a one-person-army. If people would take over work (like moderation, implementing helpful features in code, ...) more often, that might help out the admins more than just throwing money at them.
It is the same as with a lot of open source communities: It's not all about the money, it's about people getting active and involved and helping each other out.
Just to be clear: Eating bugs is not vegan. Vegans eat plants.
That is kind an off logic. Sounds more like an excuse for not taking action than anything else. I bet you can dismantle your arguments on your own in no time of you try.
I would vote for more efficient means by removing highly inefficient food "production" - aka meat. That would free up a lot of potential. Vertical farming can probably be used sustainably in some cases but I feel it should not be used on a bigger scale.
Brother, really? Have you even seen one before? 🤔