[-] mimichuu_@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

If nationalization is scandalous violence for you, let me say I want him to get the french treatment.

[-] mimichuu_@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago

Vote with your wallet

When are we going to finally accept that this is nothing but a delusion? How many failed boycotts over and over will it take?

[-] mimichuu_@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Actually socialism is more popular now than ever. Enough that mainstream media constantly writes scare articles about how socialist the young generations are.

[-] mimichuu_@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Why is it always the Save The Children Act and not the Erradicate Trans People Act?

[-] mimichuu_@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Hitler's administration was a bunch of drug addicts, the economy 5 slave owner megacorps beaten by all other industrialized nations. They weren't even all that well mobilized before the total war speech. Then he killed himself in embarrassment. How is any of that "effective"?

[-] mimichuu_@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

The correct term for nazi sympathizer is nazi. The correct term for nazi enabler is nazi.

[-] mimichuu_@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

That's called market socialism if you're interested in reading about it.

120
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by mimichuu_@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Hello everyone. I'm going to build a new PC soon and I'm trying to maximize its reliability all I can. I'm using Debian Bookworm. I have a 1TB M2 SSD to boot on and a 4TB SATA SSD for storage. My goal is for the computer to last at least 10 years. It's for personal use and work, playing games, making games, programming, drawing, 3d modelling etc.

I've been reading on filesystems and it seems like the best ones to preserve data if anything is lost or corrupted or went through a power outage are BTRFS and ZFS. However I've also read they have stability issues, unlike Ext4. It seems like a tradeoff then?

I've read that most of BTRFS's stability issues come from trying to do RAID5/6 on it, which I'll never do. Is everything else good enough? ZFS's stability issues seem to mostly come from it having out-of-tree kernel modules, but how much of a problem is this in real-life use?

So far I've been thinking of using BTRFS for the boot drive and ZFS for the storage drive. But maybe it's better to use BTRFS for both? I'll of course keep backups but I would still like to ensure I'll have to deal with stuff breaking as little as possible.

Thank you in advance for the advice.

[-] mimichuu_@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Labour unions are not the same as a communist party or vanguard but to claim they're not mostly organized and consisting of socialists is just immensely naive and stupid.

[-] mimichuu_@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Then make your own instance and turn it into a safety bubble just for you. Don't ruin it for everyone else.

[-] mimichuu_@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I mean, in my eyes Canonical is already evil. SUSE is pretty nice right now, but like I said, them being nice is nothing but a luxury. There's no guarantee it wont happen, and you could probably argue it's fated to happen eventually.

[-] mimichuu_@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

In my eyes my problem with moving to SUSE or Ubuntu is that it's the same thing. A corporation backed or straight up corporation developed and owned distro still has ONE failure point. Right now SUSE are "the good guys", but what if they get bought? What if there's a new CEO? What if they suddenly just decide to abuse their power? Then you're simply screwed. Red Hat were also seen as "one of the good guys" some months ago, but the way things work, companies always end up pivoting towards what makes them more money. Them being ethical is nothing but a luxury that happens if they can afford it and if we are lucky.

I'm moving to Debian once I get my new PC.

[-] mimichuu_@lemm.ee 74 points 1 year ago

Man I love using Firefox.

view more: next ›

mimichuu_

joined 1 year ago