How time-consuming would doing it yourself be, if anyone here has tried?
Completely agree. I find it especially inelegant that we still have such a thing as boot times to wait through, despite improvements by orders of magnitude in processing power and disk throughput. Android devices are a huge offender in this aspect, though I guess few people care since a full shutdown is rarely done.
We should have stuck with network file shares and FTP instead of outsourcing everything to Google. 'Unlimited storage' for select organizations was really good bait, but it was never sustainable.
Aside from my Pixel 7a, the rest of my phones and tablets are either old or originally low-spec budget models. This forces me to use Chromium-based browsers like Cromite since the performance penalty for Gecko-based ones becomes very apparent.
In my opinion, the reward for rooting LineageOS is pretty limited for having to risk one of the more important aspects of the Android security model, since the base system is already decently clean. If you want to go the extra mile, you could try installing the LeOS GSI, which strips out the remaining pings to Google servers (see LineageOS column of the table).
Definitely double check if the build you use has anything weird configured, but modern LineageOS (and Android in general) should already have good encryption by default. Not sure if LineageOS already has a way to toggle per-app network access, but if not, take a look at RethinkDNS, does a fine job without root.
Not much you can do about the unlocked bootloader, but as long as you aren't being targeted by some agency, sticking to trusted sources like F-Droid for apps will go a long way. I have a similar approach with two phones and minimal personal data stored on each, so I'd personally approve of those elements.
Faraday cage might be of interest with regard to the iPhone since those can still function as their own AirTags even when powered off. But modern phones are surprisingly sensitive to signals so the slightest imperfection, especially in cheap Faraday bags, could give you away. While you're at it, make a threat model to see if Faraday cages are necessary for your needs.
Same, too many clocks, all getting out of sync, and some on power strips that get turned off periodically.
I was thinking something on those lines the other day. We like to say that Linux revives old computers, and I wouldn't for a second consider putting Windows back on them, but I also have a case of hardware support so close, yet so far. I've two old laptops with nvidia chips from before the days of Optimus switiching, so you are forced to use the dGPU. Believe me, I wasted a whole weekend trying to make them use only integrated graphics. It was fine while they were supported under the proprietary nvidia driver, but as soon as support ended, nouveau became the only option and it absolutely crippled 3D performance, even on very old titles. Meanwhile, Windows still supports the old 340 driver needed for those graphics chips.
Mostly comes down to hardware vendors not bothering with Linux support and open-source in general. Which leaves support for affected devices down to volunteers having time to reverse-engineer a driver from scratch. To be clear, I don't blame nouveau at all. It must have been a ton of work to even get the nouveau driver to its current state.
Do you use a physical SIM? I'm fairly sure any carrier-unlocked phone will also work with your Tracfone service if you move the SIM over. You'll need to find a way unlock the bootloader before rooting, uninstalling system apps, or installing any custom ROM. That will be difficult with retail Tracfone phones since they are decently locked down.
If you're on a budget too small for a Google Pixel, I'd suggest looking at the LineageOS compatibility list and finding a carrier-unlocked unit you like. If for some reason you must use a phone you can buy from Walmart, take a look at Universal Android Debloater to disable some of the pre-installed bloat and the Rethink DNS firewall to block internet traffic to the stuff you can't remove.
I have heard those terms in the past, albeit not too often
Another common mozilla L
Up until 95, Windows was mostly a desktop environment for DOS. From 95 to ME, Windows was an OS that used DOS as its bootloader and compatibility layer. Not sure how to put it, but it was simplistic and fundamentally different from Linux.
The thing with NT-based Windows (including modern editions) is that the underlying system is joined at the hip with the GUI. Whereas Linux with your choice of coreutils is a perfectly capable OS without the GUI, many features of Windows are only accessible through the GUI.
Given enough time and resources, pretty much anything exclusive to Windows could be ported to Linux and vice versa. A lot of the difference just comes down to history and the ensuing conventions, workflows, and file hierarchies.
Even if we stripped out all the cruft and spaghetti code from Windows, there would be lots of nasty idiosyncrasies in its design, informed by its OS/2 and VMS (see Dave Cutler) heritage, profit maximization, revolving door of devs and interns, and years of bending over backwards to accommodate legacy programs.



The average social media profile has just headlines and lead pictures, while a good blog also has articles