I like to save them for a rainy day when I need an OCD fix.
As you suspect, only during the sixty or so seconds that they are valid.
SMS-based codes tend to be longer lived.
They're useless without your other authentication factors, e.g. login, password.
The Intel Chipset Device Software installs the Windows* INF files. An INF is a text file that provides the operating system with information about a piece of hardware on the system. That information is primarily the product name for the piece of hardware. This allows the operating system to show the correct name for that piece of hardware in Device Manager.
Typically the download from your manufacturer's website is sufficient as it has the information for the hardware relevant to your system. Newer versions from other sources (like Intel) will cover newer hardware that probably doesn't exist in your system.
My Miata doesn’t have a spare. It comes with a small DC inflator and a can of fix a flat.
My entire .dotfiles is in GitHub. Anything I want to keep common across machines is stored there and either inserted in PATH or symlinked as needed.
And one server can host multiple instances 👍
If you’re concerned that you VPS provider is replacing your certificates you need to find another provider.
You should also look in to certificate transparency monitoring. I get notified anytime a certificate gets issued for one of my domains.
That’s my point. AppCleaner isn’t magic. It’s killing off some known flotsam and making, essentially, educated guesses. It occasionally gets it wrong. Less frequently with suggesting removal of something it shouldn’t have and more often by not catching “everything”.
Apple doesn’t want to be involved with guessing games and run into the potential of getting it wrong. Microsoft doesn’t do it with Windows and none of major Linux distributions that I’m familiar with do it, under default conditions, either.
Devil's Advocate...
Codenomicon, the company who actually named the flaw, didn't find the bug via the source code. They were building a security product and when testing that product against their own servers exposed the flaw. Open Source was not a factor in this discovery.
Google HAD discovered the flaw via the source code, exactly two days earlier.
In this case, the bug was 0.267379679% more discoverable due to being open source versus being closed.
So, basically, you're bot-posting material available from external RSS feeds. Is that correct?
I like the idea. It may offend some people as they'll see it as bot activity but since you're posting to your own instance, and it's an opt-in choice on the part of others as to whether or not to subscribe, I support it.
Do you have any interest in sharing the methods/code you're using for the autoposting? I'd been thinking about doing something similar in my personal instance.
muddybulldog
joined 1 year ago
$10B US in deposits in the first four months of existence