You're misreading the ..+?
part. That means 2 or more characters, non greedy.
Another possibility is something is wrong with the alignment and they're not parallel. They could be wide enough at the base but get too close together going higher up.
Maybe they're referring to "where clauses"?
VOTE. No one should be complacent this time
risc v is not a concern because they could just build risc v chips themselves, likely more efficient than competitors too. I would be VERY surprised if they didn't have a team working on it internally. Arm and quality are their big issues right now.
Banana spiders are terrifying looking. Almost crashed once because one was crawling on the roof of my car (on the inside)
The plug is becoming a standard. There are still many more stations needed to increase EV usage for people who live in apartments or doing road trips. Not everyone is relying on them for providing charging. It's sad that they're the only ones who actually maintain their infrastructure
How would you make money as a mastodon instance? Pay to be a member? I don't see the incentive for the average user to pay when it's so easy to join a free instance (I'm considering the average person doesn't know how to host their own).
Even worse is Windows batch scripts. The syntax also changes depending on if it's in the terminal or run from a file
It's obviously a McCastle.
Another option is assigning an id per user that's only used for tracking votes. Only the user's server would know who did the voting, but you still get moderation where you could block votes from a certain id on another server if you believe it's being abusive in some form.
As long as you don't delete the voting id when the user's account is deleted, you can avoid the votes ever being associated with the user on another server. (Since a snooping party could correlate the timing of the two deletion requests and associate the user with the votes at that time). If you did want to delete them, you could say voting id deletion happens in batches. So accounts get deleted immediately, but votes only get deleted when there's some group size N available for deletion.
You don't need unsafe. Just keep pushing to a vec and never remove anything. Memory leaks are more than lost memory allocations. You can even have them with rc/arc cycles