[-] negativenull@negativenull.com 11 points 1 year ago

It's not delusion, it's Digiorno !

[-] negativenull@negativenull.com 8 points 1 year ago

I used them for a while as well. Their search was good, and their auto-generated answers they provided was very decent. I loved the idea of non-ad supported search. For me, their problem was their value proposition. You could use search for free, but you have to pay them if you want them to index your github/dropbox/etc accounts, so they could be searchable from the same searchbox. I had no need to have any private accounts searched, so never needed those licensed features.

[-] negativenull@negativenull.com 4 points 1 year ago

Like Comcast rebranding to Xfinity

[-] negativenull@negativenull.com 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Spectacular video by Stefan Milo on the current evidence of the First Americans: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsnrdCdGs7o

He even sites his sources. Solid stuff.

[-] negativenull@negativenull.com 5 points 1 year ago

Kerbal Space Program

[-] negativenull@negativenull.com 4 points 1 year ago

your moment has arrived!

[-] negativenull@negativenull.com 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cotopaxi is making fannypacks cool again. I'm seeing dudes wear these in Colorado.

https://www.cotopaxi.com/products/kapai-1-5l-hip-pack-del-dia

[-] negativenull@negativenull.com 4 points 1 year ago

He named his son "X Æ A-12"

70
The antidote (negativenull.com)
[-] negativenull@negativenull.com 4 points 1 year ago

It's just like the debate between Bill Nye and Ken Ham. Absolutely worthless as it gives "equal credence" to ridiculous claims.

Why is arguing with fools like playing chess with a pigeon? Because it doesn't matter how masterfully tutored you've been in the theory, how sound your thinking and strategy is, or how good you are at the game in general, the pigeon is always going to knock over the chess pieces, crap on the board and strut around like it won anyway.

64

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to impose new limits on state courts reviewing certain election-related issues by ruling against Republicans in North Carolina fighting for a congressional district map that would heavily favor their candidates.

The justices ruled in a 6-3 vote that the North Carolina Supreme Court was acting within its authority in concluding that the map constituted a partisan gerrymander under the state Constitution.

In doing so, the court declined to embrace a hitherto obscure legal argument called the “independent state legislature” theory, which Republicans say limits the authority of state courts to strike down certain election laws enacted by state legislatures.

9
[-] negativenull@negativenull.com 7 points 1 year ago

TLDR: "Nothing to see here, move along. And who is ProPublica to question me anyways? -Alito"

view more: ‹ prev next ›

negativenull

joined 1 year ago