[-] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If it's local, try using over-the-air TV, if your close to a transmitter, you can get away with a fairly cheap antenna. (Or even just a paperclip.)

[-] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It has nothing to do with the ethanol, the uncured resin simply covers the surface and fills small holes, hiding them

I would guess it's something funny with the 3d model, air bubbles in the tank wouldn't be consistent between layers. Try inspecting the problematic layers on your slicer.

Almost looks like the slicer might be trying to add FDM style infill, make sure it is not.

[-] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

And those are just the ones where the authors did not even proofread the thing.

[-] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Its all just weird physics and RF stuff, all they would find out is that I am a giant nerd. Some examples: common base colpitts oscillator, inductance calculator, temerature PIN detector FWHM.

[-] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

Most malware is writen for Windows, but Linux malware exists, and has been found in the wild. The most common infection method, like with windows is running a trojan, theoretically things like browser exploits could also be used, but these are unlikely unless you are a high profile target like a head of state or CEO.

I would personaly be much more worried about someone evesdropping through my microphone. All they would get from my camera is my face and some glances of the room my computer is in, but my microphone would reveal all sorts of private conversations.

[-] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago

PICK UP THAT CAN. (all caps seems appropriate here)

[-] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago

This actually makes a lot of sense. A computer executing the code and a human maintaining it need to know different things. A human needs to knon what the code does on a high level (what the programmer intended), how it handles (or does not handle) edge cases, etc. A computer only needs to know how to run the code at a super low level. Without comments, it is impossible to know if code is doing the right thing, or what is expected from the caller.

[-] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago

If you bought one the best thing to do (financially) is to immediately sell it off to another sucker, perpetuating the cycle of scams. (Make sure to hype it on Reddit or Twitter so you can sell it for even more)

[-] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago

IMHO, OOP is just dubious style points, but efficient data structures are far more useful.

[-] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago

https://tinybots.net/artbot or just run stable diffusion youself, it is open source.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

nothacking

joined 2 years ago