Thank you for the heads-up about the client restrictions!
That's great and that's what I did as well. It also feels safer to have old email just in my computer (with backups of course) and not somewhere in the cloud. I only keep a year of past emails in the server, just for reference. Will check Fastmail, cheers!
Thank you! I'm exploring it right now and I agree on the more friendly feeling.
Peer review, as the name says, is review, not "acceptance". At least in principle, its goal is to help you check whether the logic behind your analysis is sound and your experiments have no flaws. That's why one can find articles with completely antithetical results or theses, both peer-reviewed (and I'm not speaking of purchased pseudo peer-review). Unfortunately it has also become a misused political or business tool, that's for sure – see "impact factors", "h-indexes", and similar bulls**t.
That's how I interpret it. My question is if it's generally interpreted that way, or misinterpreted.
Glad to see my question wasn't so dumb, cheers :)
Thank you for sharing your experience. May I ask which machine you're using? (I'm on a Thinkpad.)
Thank you, very helpful! May I ask what you use now? Do you know if they add their software via snaps or flatpaks?
Indeed I didn't really mean to use these terms in a precise way, since my understanding of the matter is very supericial. I was using terms that I read around posts and net. With all these replies I see that there are a lot of grey areas, and a strict dichotomy or classification is meaningless...
True that too. I'm realizing it's really a matter and situation with many diverse important factors and degrees. As always, categorization only goes so far...
Extremely convenient, cheers!
Travelors = travellers + sailors. I like that!