[-] raucao@kosmos.social 3 points 1 year ago

@deadsuperhero Just because you disagree with some things, and you've been here from the start, doesn't mean someone doesn't know what they're talking about. And even if that would be the case, it's an unnecessary insult that makes the recipients of the counterarguments less receptive to whatever is being laid out below.

So if it's in good faith, then I think that's just a poor choice of title. Only wanted to point that out. Feel free to ignore it.

[-] raucao@kosmos.social 1 points 1 year ago

@NettoHikari Ah OK. Wasn't aware of that shorthand. First time I've ever seen it on fedi.

[-] raucao@kosmos.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@NettoHikari Says a person who does unpaid work for Condé Nast? In order to prove the same point again? Cool.

[-] raucao@kosmos.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@deadsuperhero Why the ad hominem in the title? Completely unnecessary, and actually proving his point about pettiness.

raucao

joined 7 years ago