[-] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 3 months ago

There are three people here who are telling you that they don't see "downvoters for disagreement" as normalized practice. I presume all three of us were also on Reddit, and we can all help shape a different culture to here. You talk of "bringing Redditors" like Reddit users are complete different species than you.

I want to bring people. Lots of them. The majority of them will not be interesting to you or me. That's okay. What made Reddit so great was that it attracted so many people that it had a really long tail of niches.

The Fediverse needs people. And I am not saying that because I am seeking "power" or "influence". I am saying it because if we keep this reactionary "it's fine like this, keep the barbarians away" mentality, the whole thing will stagnate and die. And I don't want to lose our best shot at bringing back an open web for everyone.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 3 months ago

In the general case, to get some feedback about the project. What is so bad about it that people feel like it a negative contribution to the community?

In this specific case, because I don't want to get into a "he said/she said" argument about the serial downvoters. So by asking to explain it, the public can gauge by themselves who is being reasonable.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 8 months ago

We used Slack and we had a Confluence Wiki. No one bothered to keep Confluence up-to-date because everyone was just used to ask ad-hoc questions on Slack and get an answer by one of the respective team members. We "solved" this issue at one company with one reasonably simple policy: people were free to ask questions on Slack as much as they wanted, but the response should always have a link to the related Confluence page. You could even answer the question directly with a TL;DR, but the Confluence Page link should always be part of the answer.

Every time that there was an Slack response without a link to Confluence, the responder's team would get a mark, and every month the team with the most marks would have to bring something to the rest of the company. Basically, it forced everyone in the team to step up their documentation game, and it got everyone in the spirit of "collaborative editing": sometimes, people would just write create a page with a very basic paragraph. Another team member would use that to extend the answer and so on. In just a few months, every department had a pretty solid documentation space and we even got used to start our questions with "I looked for X on Confluence and didn't find anything. Can someone tell me where I can find info about it?"

So, yes, you are right about the disconnect between "what experienced people want" and "what beginners want", but even in this case it would make sense if most project managers used real-time chat platforms only for initial inquiries and triage, but used this inflow to produce long-term content in a structured document or wiki.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 8 months ago

The whole sfw.community instance is aimed at "SFW Porn" communities. It's less about "serious" discussion and more for sharing pictures/videos with little depth.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 9 months ago

I've been doing for months already and have not been banned/shadowbanned.

PS: please stop with the stalking. You have been downvoting every comment and post of mine for the past days, even when not involved in the conversation. If you continue with this, you will be reported and perhaps you will understand that is not the Lemmy-linking that getting you banned from reddit, but just your obnoxious behavior.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 9 months ago

You being shadowbanned and a site-wide censorship of links to Lemmy are two distinct things.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 10 months ago

do you have any data on the % of people who chose to take ownership of the accounts that were created for them?

Not really. To do that the system would have to message everyone who posted or commented in any of the threads, and I didn't get to that stage.

My original plan was:

  1. Start mirroring the content to bootstrap the communities
  2. Get people on Lemmy interacting with the content.
  3. Use the interactions from people already on Lemmy as a signal to people on Reddit that they have an audience outside of Reddit. (The original idea was to make Lemmy responses creating DMs to the user to let them know about the Lemmy link). Get the people on Lemmy co-invested in bringing these "higher-value Redditors" to Lemmy.
  4. ~~Profit~~. Start seeing a bigger mass of people joining Lemmy via the "fediversed" instances.

This plan stopped at step #2 because I did not expect to have so many people here browsing by "all" and then complaining about the flood of content from the mirrors. So the absolute majority of Reddit users never actually were made aware of the mirrored content. I still think it's illogical, but I gave up on convincing hordes of people by arguing with "logic".

I was just using that as an example of how even users who willingly tried lemmy during the exodus are hard to retain.

Agree, but it's also a problem of pure lack of content. Now that I disabled the mirrors from alien.top, I honestly miss the niche communities that I participated and it is taking quite a bit of willpower to avoid saying "screw it" and re-joining the subs I participated there.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 11 months ago

$2/month per instance? That won't even cover your server costs at the cheapest provider that you can't think off. What about storage? Taxes? Payment processor fees? Your labor?

[-] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it is requesting a lot of things because it's part of the roadmap to actually do them. The next release will have two-way communication, to let people respond to a reddit mirror and send a message to the original redditor.

Keep in mind that the goal of this project is to let people completely replace their reddit usage with their fediverse account, and that will need to let people (for some time) bridge conversations betwern the two platforms.

I will eventually change this so that the reqiests for the actions will be separate, one for connecting and getting the subreddits, another to ask for permission to send messages. I just didn't get the time to do it "properly", yet.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 1 year ago

It will, soon. I'm working to make two-way communication. Responses on lemmy to a reddit bot will create a comment on the reddit thread.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've created and have been the only curator (so far) of !humanscale@communick.news. My idea is to have a good set of ideas around the idea of human scale development, "smol tech" and anything that can give some relief to hyperglobalist and soulless worldview that is so prevalent today.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 1 year ago

I value more is not having children with lifelong brain damage

First, you were talking about enforcing helmets as something that should apply to everyone, now you are talking about kids. Meaning, you just moved the goal posts.

Second, and to go back to the point, if you are concerned about children's safety we need to have (a) proper bicycling infrastructure and (b) less and smaller cars. In the US, I'd venture there are more kids dying because they are being run over by those ridiculous trucks than because of bike accidents.

Third, at least here in Germany the law is quite simple: kids until age 12 must ride on the sidewalk. That basically (a) forces them to go slow due to pedestrians and (b) avoids the whole issue of having to deal with traffic. Helmets are not mandatory, but absolutely normal.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

rglullis

joined 2 years ago