[-] rmicielski@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

Something like Browsh? It still uses firefox underneath the hood though

[-] rmicielski@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

You mean a web browser in a terminal?

[-] rmicielski@slrpnk.net 14 points 6 months ago

OpenBSD actually, but close

[-] rmicielski@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 months ago

because we all know that routers have so much RAM that installing DNS, NTP, mounts, session, log management isn't a problem? something doesn't add up...

[-] rmicielski@slrpnk.net 8 points 9 months ago

freewear.org

[-] rmicielski@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

for anyone wondering what is "LLDAP" just like me a moment ago, it's a Ligtweight LDAP implementation

[-] rmicielski@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] rmicielski@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago

you didn't link the community :|

[-] rmicielski@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

When you're done it'd be cool to have it posted on reddit's unixporn for some solarpunk propaganda

[-] rmicielski@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Well, the software would have to change first

[-] rmicielski@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

I have to just be sure that you at least know about demicrosofted VS Code, VS Codium

[-] rmicielski@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

No one is going to develop exploits only for a browser with certain default security options disabled (especially these made at compile time using toolchain). Binary exploitation is hard, and extremely not worth the effort in this case.

view more: next ›

rmicielski

joined 1 year ago