70

I have been thinking about switching to brave for better fingerprinting protection

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 80 points 1 year ago

So Chromium?

Just use Firefox, its the better browser anyways.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Almost all of my Linux devices have both chromium-browser and Firefox installed. Firefox is my default, but there are some apps out there that work a lot better in something chromium-based.

[-] animist@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago

Ungoogled-chromium is a good substitute in that case

[-] stonemilker@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago

Haven't used Ungoogled Chromium in a couple years, but I've seen some criticisms of it even compared to regular Chrome: https://qua3k.github.io/ungoogled/

[-] animist@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

Thank you for sharing this, I was unaware. I wonder if any of this has been addressed recently as the linked article is two years old (not demeaning its value, just wondering if the devs saw the article and decided to improve ungoogled-chromium).

[-] dngray@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

They still disable CRLSets and have binaries built by "contributors" not in an automated fashion by the developer themselves.

[-] stonemilker@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's why I pointed out that I haven't used it in a couple years, I have no idea about the direction development took after that, so maybe some folks that work on the development of Chromium and its many forks can give us some insight. Personally, I just decided to stick to Firefox tweaked with Arkenfox as my main browser on desktop and I have Brave with all its annoyances turned off as a backup option

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BrikoX@vlemmy.net 16 points 1 year ago

Brave might have started as a basic Chromium fork, but the various privacy/security features they added do make them standout now.

[-] naoseiquemsou@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

But they still contribute to google's monopoly over web standards.

[-] SatyrSack@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago

It is really disingenuous to say "X is just a skin of Y" just because they share the same browser engine or are forked from the same browser. Like you say, there are a lot of changes.

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Aye Firefox gang 🦊🤘

[-] WeLoveCastingSpelz@lemmy.fmhy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

I already use Firefox but brave is just better at fingerprinting protection

[-] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

There's CanvasBlocker for Firefox that can do fingerprint protection.

[-] milk@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Arkenfox is also good at protection from naive fingerprinting

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fenndev@fedia.io 35 points 1 year ago

Why not use Librewolf? Fork of Firefox, hardened and resists fingerprinting. Scores pretty damn well on https://privacytests.org and pairs well with Mull on Android.

AFAIK there are no actively developed Brave forks.

[-] WeLoveCastingSpelz@lemmy.fmhy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

I use librewolf on my work laptop it removes all cookies every time you close it, this wouldn't be a problem on mobile as I already set my phone browser(fennec) to do that but on my personal computer it crosses the border from I can deal with it to too inconvenient

[-] priapus@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

You can turn that off in the settings

[-] Mihuy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

And there won't be because brave doesn't like it when someone forks the browser.

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Firefox. Or if you don't want to spend time configuring it, Librewolf.

[-] andrew0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

I also recommend Librewolf. It's very good at what it does. They also have a list of recommended addons to enhance your privacy.

[-] boy@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

The only issue with librewolf is that updates sometimes take a few days. For that reason I’m still using ff+arkenfox

[-] BrikoX@vlemmy.net 23 points 1 year ago

All of the crypo crap can be turned off in settings.

[-] Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And the setting really does work. The crap is completely gone afterwards. There is no grayed out symbols, or nag screens or anything.

[-] DuckGuy@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

Or more accurately: can be turned on. Everything crypto is disabled by default.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] privacyfalcon9899@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago

Just switch off brave rewards and sponsored content. And, your fork is ready.

[-] freddy@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago

We recommend just switching to Brave and disabling the 'crytpo crap' yourself rather than using a fork that is liable to go unmaintained and miss updates.

[-] deafboy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

So much this. I've seen countless of spite forks. Very few of them merged the updates.

Even large projects like Electron can't keep up with chromium, and then there is downstream crap like Discord that can't even keep up witch Electron.

[-] Makeshift@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago

I agree the crypto stuff is super annoying, but it's a really nice and clean browser after you disable all that and tweak the settings (which you'd probably want to go through and configure with a new browser anyway)

[-] Lid@lemmy.comfysnug.space 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

even as a crypto user & dev, brave's crypto shit is annoying af, it's inferior by far to what everyone else uses & they push it on ur face & make u have to remove it.

i'd rather just use firefox or even microsoft edge, even for crypto stuff

[-] nomadic@lemmy.one 12 points 1 year ago

If you want Brave without the crypto crap then spend a minute or two and turn it all off in settings. You'll never see it again.

[-] EarlTurlet@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago

Except on Android, unfortunately. The overflow menu is full of all of those features right at the bottom -- prime thumb real estate.

[-] Relected@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

just use firefox and ffprofile.com

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] imrichyouknow@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

To me, Brave or DuckDuckGo are as malicious as Google

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Vertelleus@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Looks like Brave is the best for privacy over all.
https://privacytests.org/

That site and testing is run by a Brave employee, right? I'd be very skeptical of Brave's high scores.

[-] goryramsy@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

That's with firefox on default settings. If you turn it on to 'strict' and install uBlock, then it wins.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Bromite used to be great, but unfortunately the dev seems to have abandoned it.

I've seen people talking about Mull, Mulch, Fulguris and a couple others. I think Mulch is tied to a specific Android ROM, and the others are Firefox forks.

i left a big comment regarding this in another thread, TL;DR combination of brave on desktop and a lot of non-brave things on android, privacy browser + mull + DDG

https://poptalk.scrubbles.tech/comment/84466

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't want Brave on anything myself. The company has proven it isn't trustworthy many times over.

i agree, but my unpopular opinion is that mozilla has also proven this repeatedly, with nothing and nobody being universally better. privacy people love firefox, but i spend a lot of time with each major version's release notes figuring out how to undo the new telemetry (increasing integration with pocket, firefox suggest, location that won't turn off).

my threat model is 'they're all evil, including mozilla', so there are additional rings around everything

load more comments (1 replies)

I use fennec as my regular browser on android and mulch as the webview implementation

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Brunette6256@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zlatiah@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

If fingerprint protection is what I want, LibreWolf comes with a very sensible default as compared to stock Firefox. If I am familiar enough with about.config and stuff then hardened Firefox can reach bonkers levels of privacy as well

If a Chromium-based browser is required that has Brave's level of privacy protection but none of the crypto nonsense... Yeah I'm not aware of any as of right now. Maybe once the Duckduckgo Browser becomes available?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MarioBarisa@vlemmy.net 4 points 1 year ago

At that point just use Firefox / Librewolf, os just turn off all of the brave rewards crap ( crypto )...

[-] ch1cken@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

well, brave's crypto is opt in anyways, it wont be used unless you manually enable it yourself

Firefox paired with arkenfox's userjs, or librewolf which basically configures all of that for you, are also good options.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
70 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy Guides

16263 readers
20 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS