I've been using it for a few weeks now and I love it. I like it more than any app I could find on the Play Store and the fact that it's open source is an awesome cherry on top.
You don't need diffing to find something like that, bisect should handle this easily.
When I receive a notification I don't need to switch away from my editor to check it, I just glance to the left and continue with my work or react if needed. Constantly switching windows in front of me would be so much more distracting for me.
Also, being able to read docs and google stuff on a vertical monitor on the right, while still seeing the code in front of me is incredibly convenient. Again, I can't imagine switching away from my editor to the docs and to the code again.
I need to be able to effortlessly switch attention between code, tests, logs, docs, notifications. If I can't do that by just shifting my sight in the right direction, my brain doesn't function.
It's so interesting how different people are!
- Left (horizontal) - communicators, btop, Spotify.
- Middle (horizontal) - browser with GitLab, terminals and editors, main development in general.
- Right (vertical) - browser for googling and docs, terminals for tests / logs / whatever I want to see at the same time as the editor, Obsidian for notes.
Anything less than that will completely ruin my workflow. I'm even trying to come up with a feasible way to fit a fourth one.
E2E is their flagship feature and pretty much only selling point. I'm really not surprised they don't allow to just disable it.
That might be true in many cases but do you actually believe that things requiring immense investments and years of work like AAA games and high budget blockbuster movies would be created in any system?
I definitely mean "stealing" as "depriving the publisher of the cost". Limiting the term "stealing" just to moving physical objects really makes no sense in the current world.
it only holds if you'd actually have ponied up were the content not available for free
That's an interesting case I never really considered. If you only genuinely pirate stuff you would never buy otherwise then... I guess it's fine? But this alone doesn't put the end to the discussion because I find it really hard to believe that people would just give up all of the stuff they pirate if they had to pay for it. But in some cases, sure, sounds reasonable.
Artistic content is, believe it or not, produced outside of capitalism as well.
That's true of course but I don't think just pretending we don't live in a capitalist world and taking stuff for free is making this world better in any way.
Let's say something costs $20, from which 75% goes to make some rich guy even richer and only 25% goes to the actual author who put in the work. It's more important to me to give that $5 to the author than NOT to give the $15 to the rich guy. Would I prefer there wasn't a rich guy in the equation? Yes, of course, but that's often just not possible.
In the end, I genuinely want the world to be a better place but I don't really believe in extreme solutions. I appreciate your civilized answer despite different opinions. Peace!
FWIW I never experienced any of the above besides the tracking, that's there for sure.
I didn't expect a code review but it's definitely a valid criticism 😁
It took you 30 minutes to feel anything?! That's surprising. I've never seen a person who wouldn't feel the effects pretty much right away with the peak usually in about 20 minutes.
Setting up proxy is not engineering.