Not knowing where to find anything.
man, try info too. But linux might not have good man page, so use the wiki too.
Not knowing where to find anything.
man, try info too. But linux might not have good man page, so use the wiki too.
Great! I would like to use -O0 or -O1 on my distro..
Oh, I heard you are saying about privacy. The programs you are using have unlimited access to your filesystem if you do not sandbox it.
Insane graphical installer. You cannot install an os with just serial console access.
We’re using Firefox to render the UI when you’re installing locally. (There’s no Chromium or Electron involved.)
Both are insane.
And those exploits are features in Chromium browsers.
Nonsense.
Chromium sandboxing means nothing when it leaks so much data.
The attacker can't gain access to the host with javascript.
A browser that support javascript but doesn't have sandboxing might not leak these data but when their are bug in their js implementation, the attacker can gain more access to the host.
Also, security means nothing if privacy and anonymity are worse.
Security here is protection from exploits, bugs,...
Chromium is inadequate and bad.
For a anonymous browser, but not for a secure browser. The paper is purely about privacy and anonymity. No security (sandboxing, mitigations) here.
wiped clean?
It is windows users that pretend to be linux user.
They are root.
Don't sign up. Or better don't be anonymous.
Linux and BSD doesn't just work. I've been using Plan 9 and when I have to use linux I feel very frustrated when graphical windows doesn't open in a terminal like in plan 9.