yeah but this isn't about judicial review

but he did lower the crime rate

be real with me, are you just pretending to be this stupid?

This is going to happen in any prediction market whose events are opened and closed manually. Unless you can automatically halt trading when the condition is met (this is probably what people call an "AI-complete" problem), there will always be people who notice the condition is met before the event runner. The unfair trades will certainly be reversed if this is a prediction market worth even a little bit of its salt.

ah yes, sports. Where everything is fair and equal, and certain individuals don't have obscene genetic advantages over others.

nah. they're dumb. sorry.

Out of curiosity, can you post 1 (one) SINGLE right-wing meme that's funny?

I spent a while reading this post, he has to be trolling right?

do I also detect a hint of "failed to be a engineer/scientist but desperately still wants to appear like one"?

bronze age shawty's substack really tries to emulate meaningful artistic analysis but falls flat on its face because it's obviously working backwards from a conclusion. Fascinating.

Did you ... stop reading?

The real die-hards don’t think it’s a scheme to create a permanent Democratic majority; they think it’s a plot to ethnically replace white Americans. At its core, the great replacement is about demographics, not democracy.

The article doesn't try to rebut this because of the staggering number of premises you need to accept before you can even reach such a conclusion. It's really not worth unpacking here.

Dude, if you have a degree in econ I think your uni should lose its accreditation. I am dead serious.