7 out of 11 Yes' from Reps.

Is McCarthy out yet!? Huh huh?! The suspense is killing me.

And why does that? His reasoning he states in the articles?

He believes there will be convictions but overturned in appeals.

This what you said, correct?

"They're going to get on the bandwagon," Dershowitz said of prosecutors. The "approach is to get him before the election, convict him before the election, and he wins on appeal."

This is what he said correct?

Again. He didn't say that. You are incorrect.

I didn't say anything otherwise.

I just showed you what he said in the articles you provided.

No he didn't.

"They're going to get on the bandwagon," Dershowitz said of prosecutors. The "approach is to get him before the election, convict him before the election, and he wins on appeal."

"They're all going to raise it," said Eric Segall, a law professor at Georgia State University. "Trump is going to argue that he and all his merry people were simply ensuring the integrity and fairness of federal elections, something they had an obligation to do, and therefore he has immunity."

Segall said the laws protecting federal officials from state prosecution serve an important purpose. Consider, for instance, federal officials working to desegregate the South during the civil rights era being thrown in jail by state officials opposed to those efforts. But Segall stressed that he doesn’t believe the facts of Trump's intervention will warrant immunity.

He saying that's their approach. Ultimately might come down to the Supreme Court which hasn't favored Trump and similar cases so far.

All no.

Not forced. Require for public schools and such.

I would yes.

True.