Looks like it's been taken down
!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
I think it specifically works for links. Doesn't work for text posts, at least as far as I can tell.
Women's liberation is not some esoteric piece of history. It's in living memory for a lot of people and was a household term for decades. For those unfamiliar, I think it's worth asking why that may be.
This may be intentional. Wouldn't be the first time.
Logseq takes a very different approach with regards to the minimum working object, opting for something closer to paragraphs than pages, but it's currently my go to recommendation along with Trillium. It also has great stylus/handwritten support.
Doesn't Reddit totally weight by size of community tho? Not saying we should just ape the old site but I suspect it's actually necessary for smaller communities to grow naturally.
I wonder how your experience differs from mine, being on an instance with no downvotes.
I think I had misunderstood the wording of the "Will Meta get my data or be able to track me?" section. I will amend my post.
I absolutely do not think you can avoid the big social ad complex with a cryptic username.
As an alternative to Lemmy DMs folks should consider putting their matrix chat in their profile. I believe it is available as a fillable form in settings on most instances.
The implication that the experiment cited was at all meant to backup the assertion that there exists a
is very clearly a mischaracterization. What I did was describe the content of the video in a comments section otherwise devoid of any evidence that anybody had watched the video. If you are interested in looking into the body of work that establishes the tendency of men to talk over others, I have found the full-text of the fairly foundational metastudy "Understanding Gender Differences in Amount of Talk: A Critical Review of Research". It's notable that most of the research on this topic leading up to the present day has been framed as answering the age-old question "Do women talk more?".
Those are not reasons in so far as they are meant to explain the men's motivations but rather the methods by which they wrestle and maintain control of the discourse. It's important to understand that this is written largely to bring them to the attention of the folks that are actively marginalized by these activities, so that they may counter and dismantle these systems.