overview for spiffmeister

Elon Musk’s X is betting that Australia is too weak to protect its elections by spiffmeister in c/australia@aussie.zone

[-] spiffmeister@aussie.zone 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't think this is a useful definition of voting for

which implicitly gets them to vote for you.

Seems to only be true if you think of there being only 2 parties, which is why I don't think the definition is good.

Elon Musk’s X is betting that Australia is too weak to protect its elections by spiffmeister in c/australia@aussie.zone

[-] spiffmeister@aussie.zone -3 points 11 months ago

Compulsory voting means any campaign has to be focused on actually getting people to vote for you

I don't think this is necessarily true, did you miss the massive amounts of negative campaigning that happens every election?

Victorian Aboriginal truth-telling inquiry calls for major overhaul of justice systems by spiffmeister in c/australia@aussie.zone

[-] spiffmeister@aussie.zone -1 points 1 year ago

What's your point here? The article you linked relates to a murder in Qld and seems to have nothing to do with the report from truth telling commission.